My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-18_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-04-18_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2021 10:36:46 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 6:03:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/18/2016
Doc Name
Letter of Opposition
From
Jerry & Karen Moore
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geologic and Hydrologic Reasons for Not Approving Application <br /> Risk to Residents'Ground Water Supply <br /> As an exploration geologist I have spent a significant portion of my forty year career <br /> attempting to predict and understand hydrocarbon fault traps as well as fractured <br /> reservoirs. Although all of my professional experience dealt with hydrocarbons,I believe <br /> my understanding of fractured reservoirs and faults as fluid barriers are applicable to <br /> ground water as well. <br /> The only source of household/domestic water in the area is water wells. The primary <br /> aquifer is the Pikes Peak Granite,which produces from fractures in the crystalline rock. <br /> Other wells have been completed in localized alluvium lenses and in the Fountain <br /> Sandstone,but could be expected to be in communication with the primary aquifer. Most <br /> of these wells are marginal producers,typically under 10 CFM,with many requiring a <br /> cistern to meet normal household needs. This is a fragile water system requiring <br /> protection. The Westcliffe earthquake (2008, magnitude 2.5,48 miles southwest of the <br /> proposed quarry location) caused a water well in the area of the proposed quarry location <br /> to immediately quit producing and required a new well to be drilled. Although on a larger <br /> scale but in the same hydrological environment,the granite removal which took place <br /> during the building of the NORAD complex stopped most of the ground water supply to <br /> large areas down gradient. <br /> The permit should not be approved for many reasons,but my objections here will be <br /> geologic and hydrologic. Because of the complex structural geologic setting and the <br /> characteristics of the aquifer system,a quarry operation at this location has a significant <br /> possibility of disrupting or diverting ground water and surface water. If this happens it is <br /> impossible to predict how it would impact the surrounding domestic water wells. <br /> • The billion-plus years of almost continuous structural deformation and uplift <br /> surrounding the Pikes Peak batholith has created an area of fractured rock and a <br /> very faulted terrain. <br /> • The proposed area to be quarried is at the intersection of major faults and aquifers <br /> in fractured rock. <br /> • The ground water recharge and surface water is funneled through a canyon that <br /> narrows to 300 feet when entering the quarry. <br /> • The flow through the quarry is in and below the Little Turkey Creek creekbed and <br /> alluvium. Based on Transit Mix coring,this is a highly fractured fault zone. <br /> Deadman Creek has the same situation,with drainage through the quarry in a highly <br /> faulted creekbed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.