My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:20:46 PM
Creation date
4/18/2016 12:14:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/14/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors And Debtors in Possession
From
United State Bankruptcy Court
To
Drms
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 23 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:20:44 Main Document <br />Pg 14 of 32 <br />immediate and irreparable harm and is justified under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and <br />the doctrine of necessity. <br />The Surety Bond Program May Be an Authorized Secured Extension of Credit <br />28. Section 364(c) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor unable to obtain <br />unsecured credit in the ordinary course of business under section 364(a) of the Bankruptcy Code <br />to obtain credit (a) with priority over any or all administrative expenses specified in sections <br />503(b) or 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, (b) secured by a lien on property of the estate that is <br />not otherwise subject to a lien or (c) secured by a junior lien on property of the estate that is <br />subject to a lien. To obtain secured credit on a postpetition basis, a debtor must demonstrate "by <br />a good faith effort that credit was not available" to the debtor on an unsecured or administrative <br />expense basis. Bray v. Shenandoah Fed. Say. & Loan Ass'n (In re Snowshoe Co.), <br />789 F.2d 1085, 1088 (4th Cir. 1986) (affirming lower court's approval of a loan made to the <br />debtor under section 364(d) of the Bankruptcy Code). See also In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc., <br />115 B.R. 34, 37 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990) (debtor must demonstrate inability to obtain unsecured <br />credit to acquire approval of loan under section 364(c)). In making this showing, the Bankruptcy <br />Code "imposes no duty to seek credit from every possible lender before concluding that such <br />credit is unavailable." In re Snowshoe Co., 789 F.2d at 1088. See also In re Ames Dept. Stores, <br />115 B.R. at 40 (to obtain relief under section 364(c), "a debtor is not required to seek credit from <br />every possible source"). Courts grant a debtor considerable deference in exercising its sound <br />business judgment to obtain such credit, provided that the agreement is consistent with the <br />provisions of, and policies underlying the Bankruptcy Code. See In re Farmland Indus., Inc., <br />294 B.R. at 879-81 (court may consider debtor's business judgment, among other things, in <br />determining whether to approve postpetition financing under section 364). <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.