My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-11_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-04-11_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2021 10:36:45 AM
Creation date
4/12/2016 9:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/11/2016
Doc Name
Letter of Objection
From
James Enderson
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit Request No.: M2016010 <br />Agnes H. Eivietrion <br />§Z15 Austin riSCae <br />ebitAaSprings, ' s <br />801100 <br />1(1- 633-.1-ifC-7 <br />Review of the Wildlife, Vegetation, and Reclamation Exhibits in the Application for a <br />Quarry Permit by Transit Mix on the Hitch Rack Ranch <br />James H. Enderson 17 March 2016 <br />Below are comments that point to errors or other issues dealing with animals, plants, and <br />the post -digging aftermath. These concerns are based on my familiarity with the region <br />acquired in nearly 40 years of teaching field courses in zoology, botany, and ecology at <br />Colorado College. My ongoing research involves raptors, work that has caused me to <br />travel extensively in rugged drainages statewide. I own a cabin on land in Eagles Nest. <br />In the Wildlife, Vegetation, and Reclamation portions of the Application, various topics <br />appear more than once. Further, some of these topics are mentioned again in the analysis <br />by an outside consulting firm. My comments below appear generally in the order they <br />were encountered in the text. I did not trespass when gathering information for this <br />review, but remained on the legal easement to and from my property on Eagles Nest. <br />ANIMALS <br />1. The statement that "turkeys are not common in the mining area" is contrary to <br />my experience. They are especially common there, and perhaps roost in the tall <br />cottonwoods, and loiter in daytime in the adjacent dense forest. <br />2. Peregrines nest nearly two miles from the property. No mention is made of <br />prairie falcons that have nested about one mile both NE and S from the property. <br />3. The paper mentions the drainages as corridors for elk, but then ignores the <br />significance of Little Turkey Creek (LTC). The mine site is commonly used by elk, <br />except perhaps in mid -summer. The site offers excellent forage. Elk are not limited to <br />"higher elevations". Deer are present year -around because of prime forage available. <br />4. Spotted Owls probably use the area; in the mid-1990s I saw one in summer in <br />lower Rock Creek four miles NNE, and tracked another by aircraft centered about 8 miles <br />south. They are easily overlooked by ground surveys, especially outside the breeding <br />period. The riparian habitat in the western one-half of the proposed mine site is ideal with <br />diverse old -age timber. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.