Laserfiche WebLink
• stating: "Because sufficient infonna[ion is not provided to demonstrate conclusively that an alluvial valley <br />Floor (AVF) does not exist, OSM concludes that an alluvial valley Floor is present. Based on the above <br />discussion it can further be concluded that there will be no adverse effect on the AVF or its essential <br />hydrologic functions as a result of the proposed operation." <br />In a technical revision to Penni[ 79-177 for the Foidel Creek Mine submitted on September I5, 1982 by <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company and approved by CMLRD on May 18, 1983, another intensive alluvial <br />valley Floor investigation was completed along the Foidel Creek Floodplain. This determination is found <br />on pages 2.06-14 through 2.06-25 of the Foidel Creek Mine Permit C-056-82. This evaluation concluded <br />that the Foidel Creek Floodplain met [he geomorphic criteria of an alluvial valley Floor but since <br />insufficient water existed for either flood irrigation or subirrigation a negative determination for alluvial <br />valley floor was requested. <br />In the findings document for Permit C-056-82 issued on April 18, 1983, CMLRD concluded that three <br />alluvial valley floors were identified in or adjacent [o the proposed Foidel Creek Mine Permit Area. These <br />areas included: Fish Creek, beginning several miles upstream from the Foidel Creek_Mine Area and <br />extending downstream to its confluence with Trout Creek; Foidel Creek downstream of the Foidel Creek <br />iM~ne Cse~mit Area; and, the area at the confluence of Foidel Creek and Middle Creek extending <br />downstream to the Trout Creek drainage. <br />"this findings document reports on page 14 that Map 9, Baseline Hydrology, of Permit C-056-82 and Map <br />6, "I'wentymile Park Hydrology, of Permit 79-177 identifies unconsolidated stream laid deposits in and <br />adjacent to [he Foidel Permit Area. This document concludes that Fish Creek was determined to_be an <br />alluvial valley floor based upon assumed capabilities for flood irrigation and subirrigation. The document <br />• concludes that insufficient information was presented in [he permit application the significance of the Fish <br />Creek Alluvial valley Floor to farming. Field investigations indicate [hat the upper and middle portions of <br />Fish Creek are characterized by significant topographic relief, with a relatively narrow Floodplain and <br />broad meanders which Floodplain areas into small discontinuous segments. Given these characteristics, <br />significant modification of both the Fish Creek_channel and_Floodplain would_be necessar}• for these areas <br />to support any agriculttral%activi[ies other than the existing use of seasonal livestock grazing. Regional <br />availability of areas better suited to irrigated farming practices, coupled with the magnitude and cost of <br />required modifications and limited available area, effectively preclude potential development for and limit <br />the significance of these areas for farming. The CMLRD concluded that the mining activities for the <br />r par Foidel Creek Mine Permit Area would not interrupt, discontinue, or preclude farming on the alluvial valley <br />r.-y9 ,,."' Floor; would not materially damage the quantity and quality of the alluvial v_alley_floor surface and <br />~~c ~' groundwater; and that the essential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley_ Floor_ along Fish Creek_ <br />would be preserved. Foidel Creek downstream from the water gap was considered to be aft alluvial valley <br />floor because of the lack of information in the permit application. However, CMLRD also made a negative <br />determination for Foidel Creek, as they did for Fish Creek. Lower Foidel Creek, lower Middle Creek and <br />lower Trout Creek were "found [o be alluvial valley Floors because of presumed capability to support <br />Flood-irrigated aitd subirrigated agricultural activities." Negative alluvial valley floor findings for these <br />areas were as well. <br />A[ Colorado Yampa Coal s Energy Mine No. 3, a permit application was submitted to CMLRD on <br />February IR, 1981. This application was revised to reFlect [he Middle Creek underground abandonment <br />and was resubmitted on January 23, 1984, as permit application C-84-062. This application was approved <br />on October 4, 1984. As explained on pages 2.06-13 through 2.06-17 and as delineated on Map 4, Energy <br />• Mine No. 3 Hydrology, unconsolidated deposits were mapped according to surticial geology. On August <br />2, 1984, CMLRD issued their findings document on Pernti[ C-84-062. The alluvial valley floor <br />determination states that "Based on available information, the unconsolidated streamlaid deposits of lower <br />Foidel, Middle and Trout creeks are found to he alluvial valley floors because of the current or historical <br />MR 97-154 2A6-7 Revised 9/10/97 <br />