Regional seismic data suggest that the minor fault could be the result of very small oblique -slip movements related
<br />to deeper thrust faults (ramps) that do not reach the shallower Wadge coal seam horizon (RE: Seismic lines Getty
<br />1982 and Amoco 1985). The 9th Right fault appears to be part of a series of northwest -striking minor lateral faults.
<br />The second mine fault in the series was encountered (August 1989) in the 5th Left gate development within the
<br />West Mining District (Map 5, Surface Geology).
<br />The nature of the fault geometry within the mineable portions of the Twentymile Park Basin have made it difficult
<br />to accurately predict small displacement faults (< seam thickness of 10 feet) within a virgin mining district. Once
<br />two or more gate roads have been developed, the accuracy of prediction for the linear features improves greatly.
<br />Several attempts have been made to use seismic methods to map the lateral fault traces well in advance of mining in
<br />the West and East Mining Districts. Interpretation of the available seismic data (varying from older high resolution
<br />shots, recent 93 mini thumper and regional oil exploration lines) to date has not yielded an accurate tool for small
<br />offsets. The seismic, however, has greatly improved the overall mapping of larger structures.
<br />The 9 -Right fault that was encountered in July 1995 has seismic lines crossing perpendicular to its strike
<br />approximately 800 and 1,400 feet to the south. None of the lines clearly defined a fault offset. The poor to
<br />moderate seismic results are partly the result of the small offsets (most less than 10 feet) and the rapid scissoring of
<br />the lateral faults. The 9 -Right fault is a good example of how the scissoring and splintering nature of the local
<br />faults (Exhibit 9B, 9 -Right Gate -road Faulting) can produce little or no vertical displacements along the lateral
<br />faults' strike. The faults encountered produced minor inflows of water, and the measured flow from the fault at
<br />XC -36 produced 10 gpin; the fault at XC -47 produced 20 gpm. The measurement was obtained during July, 1995.
<br />The water temperature of the flows was 66 degrees and 70 degrees, respectively. A sample from each of the inflow
<br />points was obtained and sent to the laboratory for full -suite analysis. Only temperature was obtained and no field
<br />pH and EC measurements were made due to equipment problems. The lab results for the two samples, as presented
<br />in Exhibit 913, are inconclusive and indicate the source of the water may be from the Wadge Overburden.
<br />Additional sampling will be conducted to try to verify the source of the water.
<br />Exploration holes drilled within the planned Permit Area are identified on Map 5, Surface Geology, and in Exhibits
<br />52, Exploration Drilling Information and 53, Wolf Creek Geologic and Mine Plan information. Groundwater was
<br />encountered within the Twentymile Sandstone, the strata immediately above and including the Wadge and Wolf
<br />Creek seams, and also within the Trout Creek Sandstone.
<br />Complete chemical analyses of the Wadge Seam are presented in Exhibit 10, Geochemical Analysis of Wadge
<br />Seam. Data from the following drillholes are presented: 006-82-46, 006-82-48, 006-82-48A, CH -82-58, CH -82-59,
<br />CH -82-28, CH -82-71, 021-81-022, 021-81-011, 021-81-020, 027-82-033, and CH -82-36. No significant acid-
<br />forming, toxic -forming, or alkalinity -producing materials have been identified as being associated with the Wadge
<br />Seam. Lateral continuity and consistency of the Wadge Seam is good to excellent_ Chemical analyses for the Wolf
<br />Creek Seam, are presented in Exhibit 53, Wolf Creek Reserve Geologic and Mine Plan Information, for the
<br />following drillholes: WC-2013-UG001, WC-2013-UG005, WC -003, WC -004, and WC -008. No significant acid-
<br />forming, toxic -forming, or alkalinity -producing materials have been identified as being associated with the Wolf
<br />Creek Seam. Lateral continuity and consistency of the Wolf Creek Seam is good, although bench and interburden
<br />thickness are variable within the WCR area. Sample locations are illustrated on Maps 12, Sample Location, and
<br />EX53-M1 through M3, and in Exhibits 52, Exploration Drilling Information, and 53.
<br />Lithologic characteristics, physical properties, and chemical analyses of the stratum immediately above (0-10') and
<br />immediately below (0-5') the Wadge Seam and Wolf Creel: Seam are presented in Exhibit 11, Geochemical
<br />Analysis of Wadge Seam Overburden and Exhibit 53, Wolf Creek Reserve Geologic and Mine Plan Information.
<br />respectively. Samples were analyzed for all soluble salts and toric elements listed in the "Guidelines for the
<br />r T- a :z rt• ' . _ n �- - r ---' •�- -"Cl,:T Pn
<br />�. ......., ..� �..,.....,..1'.�
<br />following Wadge Seam drillholes are presented: CH -82-74c, CH -82-68, CH -82-64, CH -82-67, CH -82-59, CH -82-
<br />29, CH -82-14, and CH -82-54. Analyses for the Wolf Creek Seam included drillholes WC-2013-UG001, WC-
<br />2013-UG005= WC -003, WC -004, and WC -008. Lithologic logs of these drillholes are included in Exhibit 12,
<br />Lithologic Core Logs, and Exhibit 53, Wolf Creek Reserve Geologic and Mine Plan Information. Sample locations
<br />are illustrated on Maps 12, Sample Location, EX53-Ml through M3, and in Exhibit 52, Exploration Drilling
<br />information.
<br />PR 15-11 2.04-16 07/06/15
<br />
|