My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-03-29_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-03-29_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2021 10:36:43 AM
Creation date
3/30/2016 11:50:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/29/2016
Doc Name
Comments
From
James H. Enderson
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Review of the Wildlife, Vegetation, and Reclamation Exhibits in the Application for a <br /> Quarry Permit by Transit Mix on the Hitch Rack Ranch <br /> James H. Enderson 17 March 2016 <br /> Below are comments that point to errors or other issues dealing with animals, plants, and <br /> the post-digging aftermath. These concerns are based on my familiarity with the region <br /> acquired in nearly 40 years of teaching field courses in zoology, botany, and ecology at <br /> Colorado College. My ongoing research involves raptors, work that has caused me to <br /> travel extensively in rugged drainages statewide. I own a cabin on land in Eagles Nest. <br /> In the Wildlife, Vegetation, and Reclamation portions of the Application, various topics <br /> appear more than once. Further, some of these topics are mentioned again in the analysis <br /> by an outside consulting firm. My comments below appear generally in the order they <br /> were encountered in the text. I did not trespass when gathering information for this <br /> review, but remained on the legal easement to and from my property on Eagles Nest. <br /> ANIMALS <br /> 1. The statement that"turkeys are not common in the mining area" is contrary to <br /> my experience. They are especially common there, and perhaps roost in the tall <br /> cottonwoods, and loiter in daytime in the adjacent dense forest. <br /> 2. Peregrines nest nearly two miles from the property. No mention is made of <br /> prairie falcons that have nested about one mile both NE and S from the property. <br /> 3. The paper mentions the drainages as corridors for elk, but then ignores the <br /> significance of Little Turkey Creek(LTC). The mine site is commonly used by elk, <br /> except perhaps in mid-summer. The site offers excellent forage. Elk are not limited to <br /> "higher elevations". Deer are present year-around because of prime forage available. <br /> 4. Spotted Owls probably use the area; in the mid-1990s I saw one in summer in <br /> lower Rock Creek four miles NNE, and tracked another by aircraft centered about 8 miles <br /> south. They are easily overlooked by ground surveys, especially outside the breeding <br /> period. The riparian habitat in the western one-half of the proposed mine site is ideal with <br /> diverse old-age timber. <br /> 5. The pre-mining forest would not be available to wildlife in"50 to 80" years. If <br /> wildfire were involved, recovery might occur that quickly. But removal of substrate, <br /> even with attempts to replace "topsoil", makes recovery extremely long-term. The Castle <br /> Concrete quarry north of Queens Canyon graphically bares that out. Many attempts to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.