My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-03-23_REVISION - M2008001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008001
>
2016-03-23_REVISION - M2008001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2020 10:28:14 PM
Creation date
3/29/2016 9:32:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/23/2016
Doc Name
Engineering Evaluation
From
RJH
To
DRMS
Email Name
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Anthony Adza -3- March 24, 2016 <br /> Table 1 <br /> Material Properties Selected <br /> Peak Residual <br /> Moist Drained Drained <br /> Unit Saturated Friction Drained Friction Undrained <br /> Material Weight Unit Weight Angle cohesion Angle Strength <br /> (pcf) (pcf) (deg) (psf) (de sf <br /> Overburden Clay 120 125 28 0 N/A 500 <br /> Sand and Gravel 122 132 30 0 N/A N/A <br /> Bedrock N/A 140 22 500 14 5000 <br /> Barrier Wall N/A 125 28 0 N/A 500 <br /> LOADING CONDITIONS <br /> Stability analyses were performed for steady state seepage and rapid drawdown loading conditions. <br /> Steady state seepage loading considered that groundwater exterior of the barrier wall was at its natural <br /> level and groundwater interior of the barrier wall had been dewatered to the top of bedrock. Rapid <br /> drawdown loading considered that water interior of the barrier wall had been quickly drawn down <br /> from the natural groundwater level to the top of bedrock and pore pressures interior of the barrier wall <br /> did not have time to dissipate. We conservatively considered that negligible pore pressure dissipation <br /> occurred interior of the barrier wall during rapid drawdown. <br /> Peak drained strengths were used for evaluation of steady state seepage. Stability during rapid <br /> drawdown was evaluated using bilinear strength envelopes that used the lesser of the drained strength <br /> and undrained strength. This technique was used to conservatively prevent the use of undrained <br /> strengths that exceeded the drained strength at low stress levels. Additionally,we evaluated both <br /> loading conditions considering that the upper 5 feet of bedrock was at residual drained strength, <br /> which is very conservative. <br /> RESULTS <br /> Analyses were performed to identify the recommended setback from the property boundary to the pit <br /> highwall such that the slope stability safety factors beyond the property boundary exceeded industry- <br /> accepted minimum values,which are provided in Table 2. We identified that the highwall would <br /> need to be at least 175 feet from the property boundary;this setback is controlled by rapid drawdown <br /> loading and the undrained strength of the overburden clay. A summary of analysis results is <br /> presented in Table 2. Model outputs are presented in Attachment C. <br /> Table 2 <br /> Slope Stability Safety Factors for a Highwall 175 Feet from the Property <br /> Boundary <br /> Calculated <br /> Safety Recommended Minimum Safety <br /> Loading Condition Factor(') Factor <br /> Steady State Seepage and Peak Bedrock 2.1 1.5 <br /> Strength <br /> Steady State Seepage and Residual 2.0 1.0 <br /> Bedrock Strength <br /> 16109-16-03-10-Engineering Evaluation Letter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.