My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-03-28_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2016-03-28_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:20:25 PM
Creation date
3/28/2016 1:48:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/28/2016
Doc Name
Review Memo
From
Jared Ebert
To
Tabetha Lynch
Type & Sequence
TR115
Email Name
JLE
DIH
TNL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tabetha Lynch, DRMS <br />Page 2 <br />March 28, 2016 <br />as was planned nor will Trapper replace the amount of topsoil projected to be replaced in 2016 <br />for the KLM Pit area. Given this, Trapper will need to do the following: <br />The topsoil stripping and replacement plan shown on the TR 115, M10B Sheet 3 <br />map does not appear to be consistent with the topsoil replacement that has <br />occurred for 2014 and 2015, nor what is projected to be replaced in 2016. Also <br />the 2015 Annual Reclamation Report Map depicts a proposed topsoil stripping <br />parcel for 2016 that is within portions of the 2016 parcel and portions of the <br />proposed 2017 topsoil stripping parcel depicted on Map M10B. Please review the <br />topsoil stripping plan and replacement plan depicted on the proposed M10B map <br />and reconcile it with what has occurred to date and what Trapper plans in 2016 <br />and 2017. <br />Based on the item above, please review Table 3.1-3 on proposed revised page 3- <br />13 and make any necessary updates to the topsoil replacement balance for the <br />permit term. <br />Please evaluate the topsoil balance for the KLM pit and demonstrate in detail if <br />the cost estimate shown on Table A-10.6 is still adequate. Or, if necessary, please <br />update this table with a new cost associated with topsoil replacement of the KLM <br />pit. <br />It appears the KLM pit disturbed area is increasing in size as a result of TRI 15. <br />The reclamation cost estimate Table A-11.1 in Appendix A, shows a cost for <br />reclaiming 490.3 acres for the KLM pit. Please update this table to account for <br />the increase in acreage of the KLM pit. <br />New Building <br />Please provide details about the concrete perimeter foundation for the new building. <br />Please provide the dimensions of this foundation. <br />Please update Table A-12.1, in Appendix A to include the new proposed building. <br />Sealing of Three Monitoring Wells <br />The direct cost to seal the proposed wells was estimated to be $3,510.00. See the attached <br />CIRCES cost sheet. <br />Conclusion <br />Once the adequacy review items noted above are addressed, I will complete the reclamation cost <br />estimate. If you or the Operator have any question regarding the cost estimate and/or the items <br />noted above, I am available for questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.