Laserfiche WebLink
Chris Gilbreath <br /> Page 4 <br /> ITEM 54. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 55. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 56. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 57. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 58. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 59. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 60. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 61. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 62. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 63. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 64. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 65. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 66. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 67. Response is adequate. <br /> ITEM 68. <br /> In Volume 15, Rule 2, Page 13 the text reads, "The Trout Creek sandstone underlies the lowest surface <br /> recoverable seam to be mined at South Taylor(the G789 seams) by approximately 590 feet ..." <br /> Please revise this section of text to refer to the separation between the Trout Creek sandstone and the <br /> lowest seam to be mined in the vicinity of the proposed Collom pit, and use this value consistently <br /> throughout the text of volume 15. Please also cite the data that allows CCC to accurately assess the <br /> separation over this area. (See also Item 80 in this letter.) <br /> This item has not yet been adequately addressed. The proposed text in Volume 15,Rule 2,Page 13 <br /> continues to refer to South Taylor,which is not appropriate given that the PAP is structured in <br /> such a way that volume 15 is specific to Collom. Furthermore the value given for the vertical <br /> separation between the lowest seam to be mined and the Trout Creek Sandstone on that page(590 <br /> feet)is not consistent with information given on the following page. <br />