Laserfiche WebLink
option but to recognize GW46s' legal ownership of "RECORD", no matter where fence lines may have been <br />located prior to their removal over 24 years ago. <br />GW46 request that DRMS investigate who granted WFC the right of entry on "all" of Lot 3, SE%NW%, <br />NE%SW%, Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 W, NMPM as required under 34-33-110(2)(j) and Regulation 2.03.6 and the <br />consent to extract the coal under "all" of Lot 3, SE%NW%, NE%SW%, Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 W, NMPM. <br />WFC asserts that GW46 and its predecessors does not, and has not owned all of Lot 3, SE%NW%, NE%SW%, <br />Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 W, NMPM, yet the Lease between WFC and Gosforth's for the Surface and WFC and <br />Warrens heirs for the coal. Look closely at each lease between WFC and Gosforth's and Warrens heirs and <br />see if you can find in those legal descriptions, any part of Lot 3, SE%NW%, NE%SW%, Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 <br />W, NMPM. If GW46 predecessors didn't own the land as WFC claims, and the land is not identified in the <br />Goforth or Warren lease, who owns this approximately 11.84 acres? Who gave consent to WFC to enter <br />upon the land? Who gave WFC consent to remove the coal? The only lease that allowed and consented WFC <br />to enter upon the land and remove the coal from beneath Lot 3, SE%NW%, NE%SW%, Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 <br />W, NMPM was GW46's predecessor San Miguel Power Association, Inc. (SMP). If WFC asserts that SMP had <br />no ownership in the approximately 11.84 acres, and it cannot be found on any other deed(s), then WFC <br />illegally mined the property, therefore appropriate actions should be taken buy DRMS or the Office of Surface <br />Mining against WFC. <br />WFC has no option, but to follow the Law and the Regulation and recognize what is of "RECORD" with the <br />Montrose County Recorder's Office. No matter how badly WFC would like the facts to be something other <br />than what they are. WFC cannot provide any legal action or court adjudication or proceeding of "RECORD" <br />that would show GW46 does not own all of Lot 3, SE%NW%, NE%SW%, Section 6, T 46 N, R 15 W, NMPM. <br />Again, there is "NO" boundary dispute between GW46 and Goforth, proven by the recorded Disclaimer of <br />Interest. <br />GW46 understands that DRMS cannot adjudicate property rights as described under 34-33-114(2)(f)(1), GW46 <br />is only asking that WFC follow the Law and the Regulations. <br />The burden of proof is placed solely on the Operator, WFC, not the landowner. Should DRMS choose to <br />ignore GW46's concern(s), GW46 will elect to request a formal hearing as allowed under 34-33-116(4). <br />Thank you for your consideration. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jimmy R. Guire II, Trustee <br />GW46 Irrevocable Trust <br />P.O. Box 587 <br />Nucla, CO 81424 <br />CC. <br />Alan Boehms <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />Western Regional Coordinating Center <br />1999 Broadway Suite 3320 <br />Denver CO 80202 <br />