My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-03-08_REVISION - C1996084 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996084
>
2016-03-08_REVISION - C1996084 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:19:57 PM
Creation date
3/9/2016 10:06:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/8/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Letter
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
MR14
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Louis Head <br />New Elk Coal Company, LLC <br />12250 Hwy 12 <br />Weston, CO 81019 <br />March 8, 2016 <br />Re: Lorencito Canyon Mine (Permit No. C-1996-084) <br />Minor Revision 14 (MR -14) adequacy letter <br />Dear Mr. Head: <br />I have reviewed the MR -14 submittal, and I have the following comments. <br />L In Exhibit 15 - Subpart H of the submittal there are tables of inputs for the universal soil loss <br />equation (one table for each outfall). The C factor in these tables is called "cropping <br />management factor" rather than "cover management factor." Most textbooks describing the <br />methodology for the RUSLE use the term "cover management factor." Please explain. <br />2. Please elaborate on how the existing Exhibit 15 was used to develop the C values in the <br />universal soil loss equation analyses. Where does the value of 0.003 originate? Was <br />vegetation sampling data used to develop this value? If not, please explain why. <br />3. Please elaborate on how the LS values were determined. The best way to do this is to provide <br />topographical maps showing the locations of where lengths and slopes were calculated. If <br />maps are provided, some examples would suffice; a map for every analysis is not necessary. <br />Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. <br />Regards, <br />Robert D. Zuber, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist II <br />QF GQ�Q <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us <br />John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Mike King, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director * * 1g76 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.