My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:19:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2016 10:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/22/2016
Doc Name
Notice of Intent to File Law Suit Against Peabody Energy
From
Wild Earth Guardians
To
Peabody Energy
Violation No.
TDNX16140182004
Email Name
JRS
MPB
DIH
TNL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Texas <br />Yes. <br />Utah <br />Yes. <br />Virginia <br />No, Self Bonding was removed from Virignia regulations effective July <br />1, 2014. <br />West Virginia <br />Currently there are no plans to remove self -bonding from the West <br />Virginia Surface Mining Rules. <br />Wyoming <br />Yes. <br />Question 3: <br />What mechanism is used to determine if a company is financially health enough to qualify <br />for self -bonding? <br />Alabama <br />The permittee must meet certain financial standards as found in Alabama <br />regulation 880X -X -9C.03(7) <br />Arkansas <br />Our mechanism is exactly the same as the federal mechanism. <br />Colorado <br />Company financials reviewed pursuant to Statutes/Regulations/appropriate <br />financial practices. <br />Illinois <br />Our regulations are the same as OSM's and use the same criteria. <br />Indiana <br />See Appendix A.1 <br />Kansas <br />N/A <br />Kentucky <br />N/A <br />Louisiana <br />The requirements for a self -bonded company are listed in LAC <br />43.XV:4305 <br />Maryland <br />N/A <br />Mississippi <br />See Appendix A.2 <br />Montana <br />N/A <br />New Mexico <br />See Appendix A.3 <br />North <br />Dakota <br />North Dakota uses the same financial tests that are contained in OSM <br />regulations. The most important factor is having a bond rating of "A" or <br />higher from Moody's, Standard and Poor's, or an equivalent rating by any <br />National Recognized Statistical Rating Service (such as Fitch). The <br />requirements for permittees and third -party guarantors are the same. <br />Ohio <br />See Appendix A.4 <br />Pennsylvania <br />Generally, the company must pass a financial test. There are three options <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.