My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:19:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2016 10:58:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/22/2016
Doc Name
Notice of Intent to File Law Suit Against Peabody Energy
From
Wild Earth Guardians
To
Peabody Energy
Violation No.
TDNX16140182002
Email Name
JRS
MPB
DIH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bankruptcy seems extremely probable. <br />This affirmation is corroborated by the credit analyst. As of January 14, the unsecured bonds are trading at 8.6 cents on the <br />dollar for an impressive yield of 99%. The bankruptcy looks already priced -in. With the recent bankruptcy of Arch Coal, the <br />sector's default rate stand at an unprecedented peak of 43%. <br />Over the last few years, 26 coal companies have gone bankrupt. Walter Energy, Alpha Natural Resources, Patriot Coal and <br />Arch Coal are probably the best-known victims of the prolonged downturn. Consequently, 264 mines have closed according <br />to the magazine OnEarth. <br />As Rick Rule said, you must be a contrarian or you will be a victim in the natural resources space. The numerous acquisition <br />made at the top of the cycle back in 2011 were clearly not contrarian. Now, the coal companies are feeling the pain and they <br />are victims. On the supply side, it is important to mention that many mines continue to operate during the restructuring <br />progress under the Chapter 11. It significantly delays the production cuts. <br />With a market capitalization of $80 million and $6.3 billion in debt, the game is almost over for Peabody Energy. The following <br />table illustrates this situation. <br />(Source) <br />Over the last four quarters, the firm generated $5.98 billion in revenue and the cost of the revenue was equal to $5.18 billion. <br />Indeed, it is possible to calculate a gross profit of $805 million. It is important to remember that the gross profit only considers <br />the variable costs associated with the operations. Indeed, it does not include variables like rent, insurance or salaries for <br />employees not involved directly in the production chain for example. <br />On the other side, the interest expense generated by the debt load is extremely high. On a trailing twelve month basis, the <br />interest expense metric is equal to $452 million. In other words, the interest expense represents 56.14% of the gross profit. <br />Furthermore, the operating income is negative by $1.2 billion over the last four quarters. How is it possible for Peabody <br />Energy to pay $6.3 billion in principal if the gross profit is barely sufficient to cover the interest expense? The debt exchange <br />might be the solution. However, this avenue failed for Arch Coal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.