My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-02-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:19:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2016 10:58:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/22/2016
Doc Name
Notice of Intent to File Law Suit Against Peabody Energy
From
Wild Earth Guardians
To
Peabody Energy
Violation No.
TDNX16140182002
Email Name
JRS
MPB
DIH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Self -Bonding Survey <br />Interstate Mining Compact Commission <br />The Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC) is conducting a survey on <br />outstanding obligations related to self -bonding in the states. At the 2014 IMCC Annual <br />Meeting, it was determined that the states would benefit from a better sense of the self - <br />bonded obligations held by companies across state lines. The results of the survey will yield <br />valuable information on total outstanding self -bonded obligations, companies that are <br />heavily self -bonded across state lines, and as a result, will also hopefully identify <br />companies whose outstanding cross -state obligations pose extraordinary risk. <br />Question 1: <br />How do your state's regulations treat self -bonds? (i.e. Are self -bonds allowed by your <br />regulations? Do state regulators have discretion in accepting self -bonds or are they <br />required to be accepted if the company meets financial health standards?) <br />Alabama <br />Alabama regulations allow self -bonding. The permittee must meet <br />certain financial standards as found in Alabama regulation 880X -X - <br />9C.03(7) <br />Arkansas <br />The Arkansas self -bonding regulations are basically the same as those <br />found in the federal regulations. We feel that the wording of the self - <br />bonding provisions do allow the regulatory authority discretion in <br />accepting self -bonds. <br />Colorado <br />Approval is allowed, but discretionary pending <br />legal/regulatory/financial review. <br />Illinois <br />We allow for them, but have discretion to accept. <br />Indiana <br />Self -bonds are allowed by statute. The Director may accept self bonds <br />if all criteria are met. <br />Kansas <br />We have never promulgated any regulations that would allow Self - <br />bonding at coal mines. <br />Kentucky <br />The approved Kentucky Title V SMCRA program does not provide <br />self -bonding. <br />Louisiana <br />Self -bonding is allowed by state regulations at the discretion of the <br />Office of Conservation. <br />Maryland <br />Not provided for in law or regulation. <br />Mississippi <br />Self -bonds are allowed by State regulations. State regulators may <br />accept self -bonds if the applicant or parent company meets all of the <br />listed conditions. <br />Montana <br />Self -bonds are not allowed by Montana's regulations <br />New Mexico <br />Self -bonds are allowed. The rules state that the Director "may" accept <br />self -bonds/ We interpret that to mean that the Director could potentially <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.