Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Mr. Zach Trujillo <br />February 24, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />ITEM 27. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 28. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 29. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 30. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 31. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 32. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 33. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 34. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 35. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 36. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 37. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 38. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 39. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 40. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 41. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 42. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 43. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 44. Response is adequate. <br />ITEM 45. In Exhibit 7, Item 23 the introductory text should further describe how the models are used for <br />the design of the ponds and channels. It is not clear how/if Parts C and I are used. The Division suggests <br />that language similar to the following be added to page Exh. 7-23-1: <br />"Because it was not clear that the early term condition evaluated in Exh. 7-23, Part C was the critical <br />condition as regards to sediment retention performance of the Section 25 and 26 ponds, Colowyo <br />developed modeling of the late term case, Exh. 7-23, Part I. It should be noted that the physical <br />dimensions and properties of the ponds themselves are identical in both cases. All that changes is the <br />amount and manner of sediment delivered to them. Note also that the ponds satisfy the 0.5 m1/1 settleable <br />AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br />A Touchstone Energy' Cooperative <br />