My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2016 7:33:57 AM
Creation date
2/29/2016 8:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2016
Doc Name
page 100 to 164
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 1 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.05 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND ACTIVITIES -- <br />MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR OPERATION AND RECLAMATION PLANS. <br />2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts. (Cont'd.) <br />(3) (b) (iii) (Cont'd.) <br />reported that silt- charged streams deposited sediment in mining- induced cracks minimizing <br />water infiltration into iron ore mines in Alabama. <br />The significance and material damage to ephemeral streams from subsidence - induced cracks <br />will be minimized by continual stream monitoring, correlation to precipitation events, and quick <br />detection and repair to stream channels (refer to Subsidence Repair Handbook, Volume <br />3). The duration of any impact upon stream flow would be very short term and CWI believes <br />temporary and permanent repair could be accomplished in several days. Riparian habitat, <br />aquatic life, and downstream water users would not he affected. In the unlikely event that repair <br />is not sufficient to preclude downstream water user effects, a water replacement plan has also <br />been proposed with the change in Overland Ditch water being diverted down West Roatcap <br />Creek, no irrigation conveyance system will be undermined. West Roatcap Creek and Terror <br />Creek streambeds were not undermined. Also, East Roatcap Creek and Steven's Gulch were <br />protected by BLM stipulated buffer zones and reduced recovery plans are described in <br />Subsidence Control Plan, Section 2.05.6. <br />Because of the interrelationship between colluvial springs and ponds, the consequences for <br />ponds are included in the discussion of springs. <br />The probable hydrologic consequences for the existing East Mine site and permit area would <br />change little with the construction of the West Mine. Calculations and projections for the <br />probable hydrologic consequences of construction of the West Mine facilities are included in the <br />Hydro -Geo, Inc. report in Volume 4. <br />PR-04 <br />-134- <br />06/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.