My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2016 7:33:57 AM
Creation date
2/29/2016 8:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2016
Doc Name
page 100 to 164
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 1 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.05 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND ACTIVITIES -- <br />MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR OPERATION AND RECLAMATION PLANS. <br />2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts. (Cont'd.) <br />(3) (b) (iii) (Cont'd.) <br />monitoring wells in 1985. These well locations, labeled SM -1 through SM -11, are shown on Map No. <br />4 -1. All shallow monitoring wells were monitored for water levels and field parameters on a monthly <br />basis with water quality samples obtained on a quarterly basis. Monitoring results were submitted in <br />the "Annual Hydrology and Subsidence Reports ". <br />Responsibility for SM -4 and SM -8 will be transferred to the Bowie No. 2 Mine by PR -04 since the <br />wells will reside within the new Bowie No. 2 Mine permit boundary. <br />A significant reduction in the groundwater hydrology monitoring program was addressed by The <br />operator through TR -24. The operator evaluated the current five -year mine plan and considered the <br />extensive data previously collected for monitored locations in petitioning the Division to reduce the <br />intensity of the ongoing hydrology monitoring program. The operator evaluated previously collected <br />data and determined that the potential for significant mine impacts to adversely effect springs and <br />associated ponds, deep bedrock groundwater, and alluvial source groundwater is low. Selected <br />springs, deep bedrock groundwater monitoring wells, and shallow alluvial monitoring wells were <br />eliminated from the monitoring program as no potential in -pacts could reasonably be projected to <br />occur given the current mine plan. Monitoring frequencies were reduced at remaining features within <br />the potential zone of subsidence impacts. <br />Present Groundwater Monitoring - Permit and Adjacent Area <br />The existence of many springs in the permit area is related to the presence of saturated, mostly <br />colluvial sediments. Monitoring is concentrated on these features because most are put to <br />beneficial use as stockwater ponds or for domestic use, and some are adjudicated. <br />As a result of discussions with the BLM and CMLRD during previous revision application reviews, <br />The operator redesigned the groundwater monitoring program to include the projected five -year <br />mine plan affected area and adjudicated water rights within the permit area. Because of past, <br />higher production rates, a majority of the permit area was included in the five -year mine plan area. <br />The operator has no current projections in the five -year mine plan within the permit area and <br />hydrologic monitoring is now limited to the areas which will be affected by reclamation, adjudicated <br />water rights and the continued operation of the Unit Train Loadout. <br />Springs are monitored when accessible in accordance with Table 3, Groundwater Appendix, Volume <br />4. Generally, springs are monitored quarterly for field parameters and flow rates if they are actively <br />discharging. Water quality samples are obtained if the springs are discharging on an annual basis <br />with particular emphasis placed on the collection of samples during spring runoff. Collected samples <br />are analyzed for alkalinity as CaCO bicarbonate as CaCO carbonate as CaCO dissolved <br />calcium, chloride, conductivity @ 25° C, pH, Hardness as CaCO magnesium, dissolved <br />sodium, sulfate, SAR in water, TDS ratio (gray. /caic.), total dissolved solids, and total suspended <br />solids. <br />PR -04 -122- 06/10 <br />ffRovo n <br />1/i3 1) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.