My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:18:57 PM
Creation date
2/29/2016 8:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 1 2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
§2.04 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SIIRFACE OR UNDERGROUND MINING ACTIVITIES -- <br />MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES. <br />• <br />2.04.7 Rydrology Description. <br />(2) Surface Water Information. <br />(a) and (b) (Cont'd,) <br />"The creation of four sediment retention ponds -below <br />the mine site should control iron-rich sediments from <br />entering the North Fork except during storms greater <br />than 10 year/24-hour events. <br />"A similar pattern was found in the North Fork. During <br />some high run-off periods concentrations of total iron <br />in the North Fork may exceed standards by approximately <br />70-fold. This occurred once during the spring and sum- <br />mer sampling. However, at this time the control sta- <br />tion (NF-1 a) concentration was approximately 50 times <br />Federal standards, indicating most of the iron origi- <br />nated upstream of the study area. <br />"'There was some indication that iron concentrations may <br />increase within the North Fork study area as shown by <br />the high value. <br />• "However, there is no consistent pattern identifying <br />any particular area as the source. These few high val- <br />ues may be related to "slugs" of water that originate <br />upstream and pass through the study area. <br />"Data from the past two years show that existing OSM <br />and CPILRD standards for iron can be exceeded in water <br />originating upstream of any mine or coal loadout area <br />related to the Orchard Valley Mine. Similarly, levels <br />of aluminum higher than proposed State standards have <br />been shown to originate upstream of the North Fork con- <br />trol area." <br />The anomalous rises in iron and aluminum concentrations <br />in the North Fork are no[ tied to present mining opera- <br />tions at the Orchard Valley Mine. There is no indica- <br />tion that future mining will increase the iron or alinn- <br />inum concentrations in the North Fork River. <br />(b) (i) Minimum, maximum, and average flow data iden- <br />tifying seasonal variations of Low flow and <br />peak discharge rates are presented in <br />. Revised 12/26/84 <br />Revised 10/01/87 <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.