2016-02-26_REVISION - C1981010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Trapper Mining Inc., TR -115 Page 14 vibration, if large enough, might affect the sandstone upon which the petroglyphs are painted. The Division requested that Trapper submit a technical revision to update the following information: 1.) Revise sections 2.9 and 4.1 of the permit to indicate the site is located within the permit boundary. 2.) Revise permit section 2.9 to indicate the correct location of the site and to note the error of the location cited in the cultural resource report included in Appendix K for this site. 3.) Revise permit section 4.1 to indicate how far the site will be from the projected mining disturbance. 4.) Evaluate whether the mining setback from the site is far enough away from blasting, and given the expected sizes of the blasts, that the site won't be affected. Once this is completed, please revise sections 2.9 and 4.1 of the permit to include the results of this evaluation. In accordance with Rule 2.05.6(4), if additional protective measures are found to be necessary, please discuss them in the revised sections. 5.) Please update Map M45. I.) 1;nclosedpa„es 2--590 and 4--3a are revised ter indicate that site 5A4F948 is located inside the peri)vit boundaa) brit outside the proposed mine plan area. 2.) 1;nc1osedpa„e 2--590 is revised to indicate that the location fibr site 5A4F948 given in Appendix K, Pari V/// is incorrect. The correct coordinates are now given on tlri,s pag, e. 3.) Page 4--3a is revised with a corrected distance to the site fi^oni the closest proposed mini n„ di,siurba ice. 4.) rapper is currend) neon Loring the site with a sei,snio„ raph unit and will complete our anaCJ si,s of the effects of hCa,stin„ in the .spa^tai„ of 20 .16. 1'apeliasatnar)fineCin,,.s have shown a iininial ground vibration at the site and impacts should he negligible. 5.) h4ap M45 will he forthcoming with a Cater technical Revision when the archeological surve) flan^ the IIR--07 expansion area is srrbasaitted. 2.05.3 Operation Plan/Permit Area 2.05.3(4) The Division was unable to locate as -built drawings for the ponds listed below. Please indicate where these can be found or provide drawings conforming to the standards in Rules 4.05.6 and 4.05.9 ■ East Pyeatt #3 ■ Middle Pyeatt #1, #2, #3 ■ Ute ■ Johnson #6, #7R, #8, #9R, #10R ■ No Name #2, #4, #5R 11 rapper Response: As --built drawhn„s flaap bast 11))eatt 113 are included in Appendix Q. Ori„inalCJ ponds 111 and 113 were consiructed in 1;a,si 11j eau as number 1 and 2. /,area^ pond 112 was added between urease and tire) were apenilinahered CII, 112, and 113. All ihree ponds have designs wilhin theta^ respective section of Appendix Q. However, a new drawing far these ponds will he