My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-16_REVISION - M2004031
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
2016-02-16_REVISION - M2004031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:19 PM
Creation date
2/16/2016 11:33:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/16/2016
Doc Name
Objection
From
Equity Funding LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environment, Inc. Page 2 <br /> February 12, 2016 <br /> been the case and isn' t something new that happens since the <br /> relocation of Bull Seep and installation of the slurry wall . The <br /> relocation and construction did cause an increase to the <br /> groundwater table and did increase the surface flooding to a <br /> yearly event since the Bull Seep has allowed to become a weed, <br /> chocked drainage . Exacerbating this problem is that Bull Seep is <br /> unlined and allows leakage that enters the groundwater table <br /> faster since it flows slower then in the past. Review of the <br /> 1948 thru 2003 photos show little vegetation was present in the <br /> historic channel . I believe that when the channel was relocated, <br /> the length increased by approximately 740 feet; the channel slope <br /> was decreased by 200, so it slowed the water passage to a point, <br /> that it lets cattails and other wetland plants thrive in the <br /> channel . This restricts the carrying capacity of the seep so it <br /> backs up and floods more often then prior to the move . The new <br /> post 2004 photos show that it is out of its bank thru most of the <br /> reach from 104`h Ave to the NE corner of the Hazeltine Mine (M- <br /> 2004-31) . Some of that may be caused by the Fulton Ditch over <br /> flow but this return flow was in place in the 1949 photo and it <br /> did not appeared to cause any undue hardship on the Bull Seep <br /> prior to the construction and relocation. When you add more <br /> water to a drainage that is already flow restricted; increase the <br /> groundwater due to a slurry wall and infiltration of seepage, you <br /> have a formula for what has happened to the Orr Property. It <br /> also appears that since the Bull Seep has become vegetation <br /> infested that water backs up in the Fulton overflow drain, <br /> flooding the land. <br /> The presentation packet for the March 25 , 2015 Enforcement Action <br /> contains two plats, 12 & 14, that are graphs of the AI monitoring <br /> data and plats 11 & 13 are maps showing the location of the wells <br /> graphed. These show, there was an increase in groundwater <br /> elevation for the wells east of the slurry wall starting in <br /> February 2005 . I have made a minor revision to these plats <br /> adding colored coded lines that match the Divisions colors to <br /> show the average groundwater elevation (solid line) and the <br /> ground elevations for MW' s 1, 2, 3 , 4 , 5, 6A and 11A (dashed <br /> lines) . In some cases, i . e. MW' s 1, 3 , 4 , and 5 the increased <br /> groundwater elevation does not reach the surface and the 3 wells <br /> covered by water are those that are closest to the Orr Property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.