Laserfiche WebLink
installed by the permittee and domestic wells within the surrounding area are shown on Map <br />2.04.7-8. Analyses and programs integral to the Water Rights Plan are presented in several <br />sections of the permit. A review of these sections is appropriate. Pit inflow volumes and pit <br />pumpage drawdown projections are discussed and presented in Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences at the end of this section. Impacts of mining discharges on downstream water <br />quality and the shallow ground water quality for water use considerations are also presented in <br />Probable Hydrologic Consequences at the end of this section. Specific ground and surface water <br />monitors for the purpose of verifying draw -downs and changes related to water rights in stream - <br />flow volumes will be agreed to with DRMS. Finally, the detailed water rights plan which <br />integrates the above -referenced information is presented in Appendix 2.05.6(3) -la. <br />Water Rights Protection and Mitigation Plan The following discussion briefly summarizes <br />the approach to the water rights plan. All ground and surface water rights within 1 mile radius of <br />the New Horizon North Mine have been documented. Pit inflow and pit pumpage drawdown <br />analyses were performed and tabulated. Drawdowns and pit bottom elevations were compared <br />against water righted well production zone elevations to determine which wells could potentially <br />be impacted by the mining induced drawdowns. Similarly, surface water rights within the one - <br />foot drawdown contours were identified as those surface water rights which could potentially be <br />impacted by the mining induced drawdowns. Drawdown depletion rates were then estimated at <br />the different surface water right locations and replacement rates were determined for each. <br />Calculations were performed to estimate industrial uses of surface water and evaporative losses <br />from the sediment ponds receiving runoff from the mining areas. An augmentation plan was then <br />developed for augmenting these surface water losses during each month of the irrigation period <br />and storing water during the winter months, (see Table 12 in Appendix 2.05.6(3) -lb, WRS, LLC <br />Report on Water Augmentation Plan). <br />Calculations were performed for Tuttle, Coal Creek Canyon and the San Miguel River to <br />determine if mine discharges would diminish receiving water quality to the extent that surface <br />water rights would be injured. Table 2.05.6(3)-2 (presented in a succeeding discussion in this <br />section) shows the results of the calculations which were conducted by weight averaging TDS <br />content (by flow in cfs) of the mine discharges and the receiving waters. Presently, there are no <br />surface water rights (or users) of the irrigation runoff water primarily because there is no <br />practical way to divert the water in the stream bottoms by means of gravity flow to upland <br />tillable areas in either Tuttle Draw or Coal Creek Canyon. The effect on the quality of San <br />Miguel varies from about 5% TDS during low flow (irrigation season) to 0.4% TDS during <br />periods of high flow (non -irrigation season). This was determined not to be a significant impact <br />and no mitigation is required. <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 8 Sept. 2015 (TR -11) <br />