My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2017 8:41:47 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 9:52:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/7/2016
Doc Name
Hydrology Description
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL SURFACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS <br />The NHN permit area is drained by tributaries of Tuttle Draw and tributaries of Coal Creek <br />Canyon. Map 2.04.5-1 in Section 2.04.5 shows the relationship of Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek <br />Canyon to the NHN Permit area. The drainage divide between Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek crosses <br />the permit area from northeast to southwest and is roughly traced by the location of the 2nd Park <br />Lateral irrigation ditch, (see Maps 2.04.5-1 and 2.04.7-1). To the south and east of the divide, the <br />permit area is drained by a tributary, referred to as Nygren Draw, which in turn drains into Tuttle <br />Draw. North and west of the divide, the permit area drains into tributaries referred to as Meehan <br />Draw and Glasier Draw which in turn drain into Coal Creek Canyon, (see above referenced maps). <br />These three tributaries do have perennial flow as they act as return water drains from the 2nd Park <br />Lateral flood irrigation runoff and seepage. Both Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek are perennial <br />tributaries of the San Miguel River which in turn flows into the Dolores River and finally to the <br />Colorado River. These river systems are explained thoroughly in Iorns' et al. (1965) USGS <br />Professional Paper, Water Resources of the Upper Colorado River Basin - Technical Report. The <br />New Horizon 1 Area and New Horizon 2 Area mining permits provide a detailed description of <br />the characteristics of the region surface water systems. <br />Regional Surface Water Flow The precipitation that falls on the basins within the Upper Grand <br />Division of the Colorado is generated from large air masses originating from the Pacific Ocean <br />and the Gulf of Mexico. These air masses originating from these sources are pushed high into the <br />atmosphere, losing much of their moisture prior to entering these basins. The Pacific air masses <br />dominate from October through April, and the Gulf of Mexico air masses dominate during late <br />spring and summer. The higher stream flows within the Grand Division largely result from <br />snowmelt during late spring and early summer. By late July, most stream discharges recede to <br />base flow. Little contributions are made to stream discharges resulting from the infrequent summer <br />thunderstorms. <br />In the lower altitudes of the subdivision between the Gunnison and Green Rivers, little snow <br />accumulates during the winter months; therefore, most spring runoff events occur principally in <br />the head waters of the Dolores, San Miguel Rivers, and in the La Sal Mountains. On a more local <br />basis, short duration, high intensity thunderstorms that fall on undeveloped (natural) watersheds <br />provide some of the summer runoff. In addition, return water from irrigation, and water from <br />localized ground -water reservoirs augment stream flow during the summer months. Ground water <br />also contributes to the stream base flow during the summer months. <br />The San Miguel River at Naturita, Colorado has a drainage area of 1,080 square miles. Iorns, et. <br />al. (I 965a), presents a flow -duration curve developed for the San Miguel River at Naturita based <br />on historic stream flow records. The curve indicates that 90 percent of the time, discharge <br />exceeds 60 cfs, and that flows larger than 1000 cfs occur only 10 percent of the time. USGS <br />Section 2.04.7 Page 17 Sept. 2015 (TR -11) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.