Laserfiche WebLink
From the work that has been done, it appears that another nest of 3 monitoring wells is <br />warranted. The monitoring site would be located in the southwestern portion of the permit area <br />and would be located immediately down gradient from the limit of mining disturbance. <br />Therefore, after permit approval and prior to new disturbance, three (3) new ground water <br />monitoring wells were installed in the southwestern portion of the NHN permit area. The locations <br />of these 3 new wells are shown on Map 2.04.7-1. New ground water monitor well GW -N56 will <br />monitor the underburden (UB), well GW -N57 will monitor the coal zone (Coal) and well GW - <br />N58 will monitor the overburden. GW -N56 was completed on August 8, 2012 while GW's N57 <br />and N58 were completed on August 9, 2012. The completion diagrams for the three new monitor <br />wells are shown on Figure 3 of Appendix 2.04.7-1. These wells will be monitored and reported <br />on the same cycle as the other ground water monitoring wells. It is anticipated that these wells <br />will become the points of compliance after review of additional data and consultation with DRMS. <br />Overburden Zone Ground Water Ouality Water level monitoring and the piezometric maps <br />show the nearly immediate response of most of the nine new monitoring wells to the seasonal <br />surface irrigation with water levels going up and down corresponding to the periods when water <br />is in the 2nd Park Lateral Ditch. The impression is that the Overburden Zone is annually being <br />flushed with relatively good quality irrigation water. This further suggests that water quality would <br />improve during periods of irrigation and deteriorate during periods when the ditch is dry. However, <br />comparison of the ground water quality data (see Appendix 2.04.7-1) with the water level data <br />reveals no such correlation. Table 2.04.7-1 is a summary of the water quality analyses for the <br />Overburden Zone, showing the minimum, maximum and average values of the analyzed <br />parameters. No data for overburden monitoring well GW -N55 is shown as this well was nearly dry <br />to the point that there was not enough water to collect water samples. The summary of the analyses <br />for wells GW -N49 and GW -N52 are also compared with the WQCC (Regulation 41, The Basic <br />Standards for Ground Water) drinking water and agricultural quality standards. The results show <br />the overburden water quality to be unsuitable for domestic drinking water primarily for sulfates. <br />With the exception of calcium and bicarbonate, the water quality at GW -N52 is better than that at <br />GW -N49, most probably the result of being located closer to the seasonal more alkaline recharge <br />from the 2"d Park Lateral irrigation ditch. The values for pH at GW -N52 are also somewhat higher <br />(more alkaline). Again, suggesting that being closer to the main source of recharge (the ditch) <br />affects the water quality to a greater extent at GW -N52 than at GW -N49. <br />Coal Zone Ground Water Quality Quarterly groundwater quality samples were collected from <br />the three wells (GW -N48, GW -N51 and GW -N54) beginning on October 10, 2008. The <br />groundwater quality data is contained in Appendix 2.04.7-1 along with the water level and graph <br />information. Review of the coal zone quality does not clearly reveal any correlation with the <br />irrigation seasons, although there is a slight increase in Ca, CaCO3' SO4 and total dissolved solids <br />(TDS) during the winter months when the ditch is not running. It may require a few more seasonal <br />irrigation cycles to validate this initial impression. Again, the monitoring well located furthest up - <br />Section 2.04.7 Page 9 Sept. 2015 (TR -11) <br />