Laserfiche WebLink
the coal boom gave out -- causing a series of towns in northwest Colorado to lose population <br />and the whole region fell into depression during the 1920s. <br />STUDY OBJECTIVES / RESEARCH DESIGN <br />The purposes of this project were to conduct a Class III (intensive) cultural resources <br />inventory of the thirty-eight drill hole locations and related linear routes; to identify and <br />accurately locate archaeological sites and/or districts and isolated finds; to evaluate these <br />surface finds for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); to determine <br />the potential effect of the project on all NRHP- eligible resources; and to make <br />recommendations for the mitigation of the adverse effects on those cultural resources. The <br />presence of cultural and paleontological resources was considered likely based on <br />previously recorded sites and localities within the vicinity. <br />FIELD METHODS <br />The project area consists of thirty-eight drill hole locations, and 5.7 miles of <br />proposed access roads totaling 1232 acres. Within the specified project areas, 100 acres <br />were previously, recently inventoried (Shell-GRI #2013-13,17,50, BLM #13-11-15, OAHP <br />#RB.LM.R1350, and Daub-GRI #2013-82) and, per BLM could be omitted. A Class III, <br />100% pedestrian cultural resources survey of the inventory areas was made by crews of four <br />to six archaeologists walking a series of transects spaced at intervals of 15 meters based on <br />the topographic features of the study area. The field archaeologists worked from USGS 7.5 <br />minute series maps. A total of 1132 acres (1114/BLM and 18/private) was subjected to <br />intensive inventory. <br />Cultural resources were sought as surface exposures and were characterized as sites <br />or isolated finds. A site is the locus of previous human activity (50 year minimum) at <br />which the preponderance of evidence suggests either a one-time use or repeated use <br />over time, or multiple classes of activities. For example: a) Isolated thermal features such <br />as hearths are to be designated as sites, due to the interpretable function of such <br />utilization and the potential for chronometric and economic data of recovery, b) Single <br />element rock art panels are to be designated as sites due to the interpretive nature of such <br />an event and the potential diagnostic value of the motif, c) Similarly, isolated human <br />burials are to be designated as sites, or d) Loci exhibiting ground stone and flake stone in <br />association. <br />An isolate refers to one or more culturally modified objects not found in the context of <br />a site as defined above. Note that this definition makes no reference to an absolute <br />quantitative standard for the site/isolate distinction. For example: a) A discrete concentration <br />of flakes from the same material regardless of the number of artifacts present likely represents <br />a single, random event and is properly designated as an isolate, or b) Similarly, a ceramic pot <br />bust is to be recorded as an isolate, regardless of the number of sherds that remain. <br />48