My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-14_REVISION - M1983194
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983194
>
2016-01-14_REVISION - M1983194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:33 PM
Creation date
2/3/2016 12:24:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/14/2016
Doc Name
Mine Plan Mod 500K TPY
From
Natural Soda, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
THM
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and western portion of Colorado” (Swanton 1953:372). The Bannock and Shoshone roamed <br />over the extreme northwestern corner of the state (ibid.:370). John Wesley Powell notes the <br />presence of Utes west of the Green River as well, in the Uintas (Powell 1961). <br />According to Athearn (1976:3), the Ute were the largest group in northwestern <br />Colorado, with Arapahoe in North and Middle Parks in conflict with them over hunting <br />rights. Several fights between the Ute and Arapahoe occurred in the Steamboat Springs <br />region. The Ute Yahmonite described a battle ca.1815 in the area now occupied by the hot <br />springs pool. Large numbers of arrowheads were found just west of town, indicating a <br />similar fight took place there, too. “The Arapahoe Indians were the traditional enemies of <br />the Yampatika Utes” (Powell 1972). Shoshone also frequented Brown's Park in the winter. <br />These were Wind River Shoshone, who are similar to Ute linguistically, and there was <br />rarely trouble between them (Farnham 1841). The Ute shared with the Shoshone the <br />reputation of being the strongest and most warlike of the Plateau people” (Swanton <br />1953:375). <br />J. W. Powell, relying on a study of linguistics published in 1891, noted, regarding <br />the Shoshonean linguistic family: The Washaki occupied southwest Wyoming. Nearly the <br />entire mountainous part of Colorado was held by the several bands of the Ute, the east and <br />southeast parts of the state being held respectively by the Arapahoe and Cheyenne, and the <br />Kiowa. To the southeast the Ute country included the northern drainage of the San Juan, <br />extending east a short distance into New Mexico. The Commanche division of the family <br />extended farther east than any other. According to Crow tradition, the Commanche <br />formerly lived northward in the Snake River region. Omaha tradition avers that the <br />Commanche were on the Middle Loup River, probably within the present century. <br />According to Pike, the Comanche territory bordered the Kiowa, on the north, the former <br />occupying the headwaters of the Upper Red River, Arkansas, and Rio Grande (Powell <br />1966:85). <br />Powell (1961) noted that the Ute were organized into small bands – Uintah, <br />Wimonuntic, Mowatavi-Watsiu, Mowatri, Kopata, and others, with Uintah predominating. <br />Emmitt (1954) states that the White River Utes called themselves Nupartka. The Ute had <br />secured horses by the 1680s from the Spanish in New Mexico, and ranged from Salt Lake <br />City to Pikes Peak, from Taos to the Green River. They used the river valleys for shelter in <br />the winter and summered in high mountain parks. They were not hostile to whites at first <br />contact, though in the late 17th and 18th centuries they were continually at war with <br />Arapahoe, Commanche, and other plains tribes (Athearn 1976:6). <br />Travel through the territory was certainly more interesting when the Indians moved <br />freely through the area. The early trappers met the danger as best they could, often <br />marrying Indian women, hoping for some measure of security in that arrangement. <br />Apparently Shoshone and Crow women were much sought after by the trappers, though <br />Indian groups varied a great deal in the kinds of arrangements required to secure a bride -- <br />from simple purchase to the necessity for adoption into the culture. Shoshone women could <br />be purchased with ponies and trade goods, and trappers often had their pick of the women <br />35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.