Laserfiche WebLink
(1963, 1965) Post-Piney Creek alluvium, which ages to a period from about 4500 to as late <br />as 2800 rcybp (Miller in prep.). The last fill sequence is Lightning equivalent alluvium <br />(also after Leopold and Miller 1954) which post-dates 1000 rcybp (Miller 1992, in prep). <br />The Moorecroft equivalent cut terrace (after Leopold and Miller 1954) was formed between <br />6500 and 4500 (Miller in prep.) and incised into Kaycee equivalent alluvium. <br />The fill sequences are related to periods of long term drought. The greatest part of <br />the fill in the valleys (i.e., Kaycee equivalent alluvium) is a result of severe drought <br />accompanying the onset of the Holocene climatic envelope and is the sediment formerly <br />stored on slopes in the Late Pleistocene soil. An alternate theory indicates that fill is a <br />consequence of cooler, wetter conditions, but the ages of Kaycee equivalent deposition <br />correspond almost exactly with the formation of all the major dune fields that formed in the <br />Rocky Mountain basins and western Plains areas (Miller 1992, in prep.), so the association <br />of alluvial deposition with cool, wet climates is erroneous. <br />Deposition in warm, arid intervals is a consequence of lost capacity and competence <br />in the alluvial system (where capacity describes the quantity of sediment a drainage can <br />move, and competence is the largest sized particle a drainage can move). Essentially, the <br />drainages became choked with sediment during deposition of the Kaycee equivalent <br />alluvium. This was an event that could not be repeated because the end of the Pleistocene <br />was the only time such a large volume of sediment was available at one time for transport. <br />Climates ameliorated after 6500 rcybp. With the return of cooler, concomitantly <br />moister conditions, incision began; the Moorecroft-equivalent cut terrace formed <br />somewhere during this period. After formation of the Moorecroft equivalent cut-terrace, <br />however, incision was initiated once more and the present day depth of incision is relict of <br />the interval. Regional and even global evidence mark the middle Holocene as one of the <br />coolest, moistest episodes since the end of the Pleistocene (Miller 1992, in prep.). In-filling <br />(i.e. post-Piney Creek alluvium equivalent) began again by about 4500 rcybp when climates <br />apparently warmed and dried and the streams again experienced diminished power (i.e. loss <br />of capacity and competence). <br />Renewed deposition (post-Piney Creek equivalent) continued until at least 2800 <br />rcybp, when another cycle of erosion ensued. This cycle of erosion likely deepened the <br />incision and culminated in the final depth as seen in the present day. It is notable, however, <br />that the equivalent of Late Glacial gravels, usually exposed by middle Holocene erosion, are <br />not exposed in the area. This attests to the exceptionally large volume of sediment that <br />became available for transport at the end of the Pleistocene glaciation and the inability of <br />the trunk drainages to move it further downstream and out of the local alluvial system. <br />Volume of fill, as mentioned above, is considerably more than exposed in the arroyo walls – <br />again, probably less than half of the total depth of fill is viewable in the present day <br />incisions. <br />After 1000 rcybp, climate became warmer and drier again, and Lightning equivalent <br />alluvium was deposited in the channel bottoms. When climate ameliorated once again <br />during the Little Ice Age, incision followed. <br />10