My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-01_INSPECTION - C1996084
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1996084
>
2016-02-01_INSPECTION - C1996084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:16:00 PM
Creation date
2/3/2016 10:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
2/1/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Inspection Date
1/28/2016
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 28, 2016 C-1996-084/Lorencito Canyon Mine RDZ <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br />NA - Air Resource Protection <br />N - Availability of Records <br />NA - Backfill & Grading <br />R - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />NA - Explosives <br />N - Fish & Wildlife <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />N - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan <br />N - Other <br />NA - Processing Waste <br />N -Roads <br />R - Reclamation Success <br />N - Revegetation <br />NA - Subsidence <br />N - Slides and Other Damage <br />NA - Support Facilities On-site <br />N -Signs and Markers <br />N - Support Facilities Not On-site <br />N - Special Categories Of Mining <br />N -Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />A partial inspection was conducted by Rob Zuber of DRMS on January 28, 2016. The weather was clear and cold. <br />The ground was partially snow-covered on the north -facing slopes. Vince Massarotti was present for all of the <br />inspection. <br />EXCESS SPOIL and DEVELOPMENT WASTE — Rule 4.09 <br />Placement; Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization: <br />Fills 7, 8, and 9 were inspected; all were generally in good condition. There were no signs of instability or erosion <br />on the faces. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; <br />Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br />Drainage — Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />The following ponds were inspected: 6, 7, 8, and 9. None of them were discharging. Their embankments and <br />spillways were in good condition. As mentioned before, a rill next to the emergency spillway for Pond 6 should be <br />repaired. <br />The top of the Pond 8 embankment is bare. However, re -vegetating this area may be difficult due to animal traffic. <br />NECC should consider how this could be accomplished, and if it is worth the effort. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 7 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.