Laserfiche WebLink
13. On November 20, 2015, upon review of L.B.R. 9013-1 Notice, however, the Court issued <br />an Order for Compliance with Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1 or Other Applicable Rules <br />of Procedure Regarding Service and Notice because James Jameson failed to serve a <br />copy of the notice upon all creditors and other parties in interest at their addresses of <br />record in connection with the September Application. The Court specifically noted that a <br />"[c]omparison of the creditors' matrix to the Debtor's service list revealed that several <br />creditors were not served with the L.B.R. 9013-1 Notice." The Court ordered a cure date <br />of December 4, 2015, failing which the Second Application would be denied without <br />further notice. See Docket #37. <br />14. On December 14, 2015, The Court entered an Order Denying James Jameson's <br />September Application to Employ because James Jameson failed to cure the deficiency <br />raised in the Court's November 20, 2015 Order. See Docket #46. <br />15. It should be noted that on November 20, 2015, the Court also issued an Order for <br />Compliance with Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1 in connection with James Jameson's <br />Motion to Set Bar Date for Filing Proofs of Claim. See Docket #38. James Jameson also <br />failed to cure this deficiency and that motion was denied. See Docket #46. <br />16. On December 23, 2015, James Jameson filed the December Application to Employ with <br />an accompanying Affidavit. See Docket #50. Paragraph 10 states that the "Debtor <br />believes that the employment of the law firm of Buechler Law Office, L.L.C., as <br />attorneys for the Debtor would be in the best interest of creditors and the bankruptcy <br />estate." Id. at ¶ 10. <br />17. James Jameson's Affidavit states that he is an attorney licensed to practice law in the <br />State of Texas and that he is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the <br />Southern District of Texas. James Jameson stated that he has also "been admitted to the <br />U.S. District Court in Colorado on a pro hac vice basis." He has not been admitted to the <br />Colorado Bar. See Docket 50, Affidavit at ¶ 1. Upon information and belief, James B. <br />Jameson & Associates , P.C. maintains an office in Houston, Texas and it does not <br />maintain an office in Colorado. See e.g., Docket 50, Affidavit at ¶ 2. <br />18. James Jameson filed an accompanying 9013-1 Notice with the December Application to <br />Employ. See Docket 51. <br />OBJECTION <br />STANDARD OF REVIEW <br />19. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586(a)(3), the UST is charged with administrative oversight of <br />the bankruptcy system in this District. Such oversight is part of the UST's overarching <br />responsibility to enforce the laws as written by Congress and interpreted by the Courts. <br />See United States Trustee v. Columbia Gas Sys., Inc. (In re Columbia Gas Sys., Inc.), 33 <br />F.3d 294, 295-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (noting that UST has "public interest standing" under 11 <br />3 <br />