My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-14_REPORT - M1980244 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-01-14_REPORT - M1980244 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:32 PM
Creation date
1/15/2016 2:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/14/2016
Doc Name
Final Report Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results
From
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
ERR
AME
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 <br />(9,550-foot Elevation Bench to Geomembrane Panel P1635) <br />Final Report <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results <br />January 2016 <br />Project No.: 74201125N0 Page 16 <br /> Moisture Content <br />Amec Foster Wheeler measured the moisture contents of SF, SSF, LDF, UF, SLF, and <br />DCF as part of the CQA program. Moisture content data is presented in Tables 5 through <br />10. Note the oven moisture content testing for SLF was calculated with the nuclear <br />gauge wet density reading to produce accurate density and moisture contents. <br /> Atterberg Limits <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed Atterberg limits testing of fill materials. All fill materials, <br />with the exception of SLF and some SF, were non-plastic. The SF, SSF, LDF, UF, SLF, <br />and DCF samples tested met project technical specifications for Atterberg limits. <br />Atterberg limits test results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized on Tables <br />5 through 10. <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed nine CQA Atterberg limits of SF. The actual testing <br />frequency (approximately one test per 7,639 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum <br />specified testing frequency of one test per 50,000 cubic yards. The SF CQA Atterberg <br />limits results met the project technical specifications; the results are presented in <br />Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 5. <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed one CQA Atterberg limits of SSF. The actual testing <br />frequency (approximately one test per 205 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum <br />specified testing frequency of one test per 50,000 cubic yards. The SSF CQA Atterberg <br />limits results met the project technical specifications; the results are presented in <br />Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 6. <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed one CQA Atterberg limits of LDF. The actual testing <br />frequency (approximately one test per 120 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum <br />specified testing frequency of one test per 10,000 cubic yards. The LDF CQA Atterberg <br />limit results met the project technical specifications; the results are presented in <br />Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 7. <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed one CQA Atterberg limit of UF. The actual testing <br />frequency (approximately one test per 817 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum <br />specified testing frequency of one test per 5,000 cubic yards. The UF CQA Atterberg <br />limits results met the project technical specifications; the results are presented in <br />Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 8. <br />Amec Foster Wheeler performed 39 CQA Atterberg limits of SLF. The actual testing <br />frequency (approximately one test per 3,483 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum <br />specified testing frequency of one test per 4,000 cubic yards. The SLF CQA Atterberg <br />limits results met the project technical specifications; the results are presented in <br />Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 9.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.