Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. J.C. York <br /> July 13, 2015 Page 2 <br /> Table 1 —Wells within area of Influence of Proposed Slurry Wall <br /> Well Data from Wells Within Area of Influence Model Results <br /> Well Reported Saturated Max.Change Future Depth Future %Change <br /> Name Pemit Rate(gpm) Depth to Thickness in Water Saturated in Sat. <br /> Depth Water(ft) (ft) Levels(ft) to Water(ft) Thickness(ft) Thick(ft) <br /> DOWNGRADIENT WELLS <br /> VARRA 75865 F ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> DAVIS FARMS 14960 R 101 1150 31 70 -1 32 69 -1% <br /> BAAB A C 620 W 45 800 9 36 -1 10 35 -3% <br /> TAYLOR JAMES 223885 44 10 11 33 -1 ND ND ND <br /> UPGRADIENT WELLS <br /> TRUJILLO 23312 25 10 5 20 1 4 21 5% <br /> ORONA 28174 _ 19 20 8 11 1 7 12 9% <br /> PALMA 297435 ND ND ND ND 1 Uncertain Uncertain Uncertain <br /> HARRELL ELDON 226878 50 15 16 34 2 14 36 6% <br /> ROTHE 259513 27 20 2 25 1 1 26 4% <br /> TRUYELLO 2947 F _ 21 400 6 15 1 5 16 7% <br /> HARRELL BRIAN 287278 30 50 ND ND 2 Uncertain Uncertain Uncertain <br /> DILKA 44539 34 25 3 31 1 2 32 3% <br /> VANBEBER 25941 _ 25 50 2 23 1 1 24 4% <br /> WADSWORTH 19472 F _ ND 105 ND ND 1 Uncertain Uncertain Uncertain <br /> VANBEBER 16038 25 24 4 21 1 3 22 5% <br /> Three down gradient wells can be expected to experience a decline in water levels of <br /> approximately 1 foot. Since well yield is proportional to the saturated thickness, we would <br /> expect less than a 5% decrease in the maximum theoretical pumping rate of those wells. We do <br /> not believe this is a significant impact. <br /> Based on our modeling, eleven up gradient wells can be expected to have 0.5 to 2 foot increases <br /> in water levels. Only one of those wells (Harrell Eldon) has a reported pre-mining water level <br /> depth exceeding 10 feet. The rest of the wells either have reported depths to water of less than <br /> 10 feet or no recorded level so the depth remains "uncertain." If the recorded well locations and <br /> depth to water are correct relative to the pit and if the wells are located near vulnerable structures <br /> (homes with basements or excavations), those structures could be vulnerable to rising <br /> groundwater resulting from the slurry wall. <br /> Uncertainty <br /> Whether future flooding or water logging will occur depend on numerous factors including: 1) <br /> well location relative to the pit and slurry wall; 2)the location and depth of vulnerable structures <br /> such as homes with basements; 3) the location, magnitude and timing of well pumping and <br /> recharge from precipitation, agriculture, and canal seepage that could also affect water levels; <br /> and 4) the location of existing drainage or canals that may intercept rising groundwater. <br /> Therefore, there is considerable uncertainty whether there is a real and quantifiable risk of <br /> significant impact. <br /> Mitigation <br /> Potential mitigation includes: 1) installing a drain around the slurry wall to minimize any <br /> mounding or shadow effect to keep the aquifer at equilibrium 2) or moving or abandoning <br />