My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-10-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2015-10-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2016 10:41:50 AM
Creation date
1/11/2016 8:39:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/6/2015
Doc Name
Special Mining Categories
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2.06
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />conditions averaging 25.1 feet from 13 measurements taken in 1996, 1997 and 2005 (Table 1 - <br />Groundwater Parameters, from August 16, 2005 letter to Jim Stark from Walsh Environmental). <br />• Active erosion in the stream channels is causing further incision and reduced flood frequency, <br />reducing the ability of this valley bottom to support any agricultural use other than rangeland or <br />dryland agriculture. There is no evidence of "modern terracing" in the area proposed for <br />disturbance near the Gossard Loadout facilities. <br />• Local and regional agricultural economics are prohibitive to developing irrigation projects within <br />this valley bottomss, and such practices are in decline locally. <br />• Historical irrigation activities associated with the "diversion structure and ditch" located <br />hydrologically above the proposed access road path, diverted water around the existing grain <br />fields, under County Road 17, outside the current permit boundary to the fields northeast of <br />County Road 17. This activity was not recommenced after the mass wasting events (1983-1984) <br />disabled the functionality of the system. There are no plans to repair and put back into service <br />this irrigation system in the future. <br />• Colowyo contends that based on the descriptions and defining characteristics needed to classify <br />an area as a functioning alluvial valley floor, the area proposed for disturbance associated with <br />the Collom Haul Road in the area of the Lower Wilson Drainage no longer qualifies as an alluvial <br />valley floor and should not require a material damage assessment, water monitoring program, etc. <br />due to the fact the area is not a functional alluvial valley floor "pre -disturbance". Colowyo does <br />however plan to return the area of disturbance to pre -disturbance condition at the cessation of <br />mining activities. <br />Specific discussion of the Collom Gulch Area <br />Lower portions of Collom Gulch have been studied before and since the release of the 1985 OSM <br />Alluvial Valley Floor (AVF) Reconnaissance map. The reconnaissance by OSM was compiled on <br />1:100,000 -scale maps and was meant to represent a reconnaissance level effort to identify areas which are <br />likely (my emphasis) to meet the AVF definition (from Introduction to OSM report accompanying this <br />study). Thus, any area identified on the OSM maps are potential AVFs. It was recognized in this study <br />that future studies may more conclusively prove or disprove the AVF findings in the report. <br />Colowyo and other companies in this area performed AVF studies to more conclusively prove or disprove <br />the existence of AVFs in this potential coal mining area of the Danforth Hills. For the Collom area, there <br />has been significant studies to date examining the Collom Gulch and theotp ential for an AVF in the area <br />possibly affected by mining activities in the Collom light area. <br />As noted in the previously submitted text, alluvial materials are present in the valley bottoms of the <br />Collom Gulch drainages but the materials are intermixed with significant fractions of colluvium and <br />sheetwash from adjacent slopes. This can be seen in the geologic description of the monitoring well <br />(MC -04-02) in the lower portion of Collom Gulch in Section 24, T. 3 N., R. 93 W. The cuttings obtained <br />from the drill hole are predominantly silty clays, with minor amounts of sand and gravel (<25%). <br />Based on depth to groundwater in this drill hole (10 feet below ground surface), it is doubtful that <br />subirrigation of any plant crop is possible. Further to the north, near the confluence of Collom Gulch and <br />Little Collom Gulch, monitoring well MLC -04-01, has a ground water level of between 40 and 50 feet <br />below ground water surface. <br />In addition, active erosion in the Collom Gulch channel is causing further incision, which is lowering the <br />unconfined, groundwater table found in the valley. The incision in Collom Gulch is at least two feet and <br />in excess of 20 feet in sections before that flow of Collom Gulch exits through the `hogback' and flows <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 147 Revision Date: 9/28/11 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.