My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2016-01-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:19 PM
Creation date
1/11/2016 8:10:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/8/2016
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Letter
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining( and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />January 8, 2016 <br />Al Weaver <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 459 <br />Florence, CO 81226 <br />Re: Southfield Mine (Permit No. C-1981-014) <br />Bond Release Application No. 3 (SL -3) — Second adequacy letter <br />Dear Mr. Weaver: <br />DRMS staff has reviewed your responses to our adequacy items (responses in submittal from EFCI dated 31 <br />December 2015). The following adequacy issues require additional responses by Energy Fuels (EFCI). <br />From general review of application <br />1. No additional response required. <br />2. No additional response required. <br />3. The Division understands that the reference to Attachment 1 was a mistake; no additional <br />response required. Regarding EFCI's explanation as to why the LS factors for the reclaimed <br />areas and the non -mined areas are identical, the Division still believes that is best to assess <br />the LS parameter separately: the post -mining condition should be based on the current <br />topography of the areas where bond release is sought, whereas the pre -mining condition <br />should be based on the pre -mining topography of the actual location of the RDA and <br />facilities area or on the topography of adjacent unmined areas. Also, Map 13 and 29 are <br />referenced in the sediment demonstration for the mine site; however, these maps are related <br />to the loadout. Please correct this error. <br />4. No additional response required. <br />5. No additional response required. <br />From review of vegetation reports in application <br />6. No additional response required. <br />7. No additional response required. <br />From bond release inspection and previous inspections <br />8. No additional response required. <br />9. As EFCI noted, this discussion is pending the water quality laboratory results. <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us <br />John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Mike King, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.