Laserfiche WebLink
Poudre Pits Combined SWSP <br />December 28, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />ground water surface to the river; the width (W) of the aquifer on the side of the river where the pit <br />is located; the transmissivity (T); and the specific yield (S). The Glover parameters used for each pit <br />site are shown in the table below. <br />Table C - Glover Parameters (Evaporative/Operational Losses <br />Site Name <br />X (ft) <br />W (ft) <br />T (gpd/ft) <br />S <br />Firestein/Tigges <br />1,112 <br />8,000 <br />120,000 <br />0.20 <br />La Poudre <br />West Lake <br />512 <br />4,800 <br />50,000 <br />0.20 <br />Middle Lake <br />399 <br />4,800 <br />50,000 <br />0.20 <br />East Lake <br />626 <br />4,800 <br />50,000 <br />0.20 <br />North La Poudre <br />2,500 <br />4,800 <br />50,000 <br />0.20 <br />Dewaterinq <br />Dewatering has occurred at each pit over varying intervals from 1996 through 2015. The West <br />Lake of the La Poudre site is the only site that will be actively dewatered during this SWSP period. <br />In the past, it was assumed that the pits were dewatered at a rate of 500 gpm with all water <br />released directly to the river. These assumptions have been revised to reflect the historic average <br />dewatering rate of 100 gpm where the majority (75%) of the water was recharged in the adjacent <br />pits with only 25% discharged directly to the river. This is based on a reevaluation of historic <br />operations by the operator's consultant and a December 20, 2012 letter from Mark Johnson, <br />Compliance Manager with Bestway Concrete and Aggregates as well as submitted pump specifications <br />and data showing the 100 gpm is a more accurate estimate than the previously accepted 500 gpm. <br />Mark Johnson described the recharge operation as occurring simultaneously with dewatering in that <br />the operator would discharge the water into an adjacent, previously mined, cell. Once the cell <br />being recharged exceeded its hydraulic capacity the water would then be diverted directly to the <br />river. <br />Dewatering operations at the Firestein Pit occurred from January 1996 through June 2001. <br />With the stated recharge that occurred, the lagged depletions to be replaced in 2016 equal 0.16 <br />acre-feet. Dewatering operations at the Tigges Pit occurred from June 2005 through March 2012. <br />With the stated recharge that occurred, the lagged depletions to be replaced in 2016 equal 5.37 <br />acre-feet. Dewatering operations at the Roberts Pit occurred from July 2001 until June 2006. With <br />the stated recharge that occurred, the lagged depletions to be replaced in 2016 equal 0.83 acre- <br />feet. Combined, the dewatering operations at the Firestein/Tigges/Roberts Pit have resulted in a <br />lagged depletion of 6.36 acre-feet that must be replaced in 2016. <br />Dewatering operations at the La Poudre Pit occurred from January 1995 through December <br />2002, and during October and November of 2014. The site is projected to be dewatered at an <br />average rate of 74 gpm during this plan period, with dewatering water delivered to recharge in the <br />6.42 -acre pond located in the western portion of the North La Poudre site. Combining the lagged <br />depletions and net accretions from the stated recharge with projected dewatering depletions and <br />accretions, dewatering activities at the La Poudre Pit site will create a net depletion of 81.34 acre- <br />feet during 2016. At the North La Poudre site, dewatering operations occurred from September 2002 <br />through March 2003 and recommenced from April 2012 through July 2014. The 2012 dewatering was <br />not metered therefore no recharge credit was given. Instead, all 2012 dewatering was assumed to <br />be discharged directly to the river creating no lagged accretions. The operator installed meters at <br />this site by January 2013 and starting January 2013 the actual meter readings are used in the <br />