Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix 4.7-8 <br />Part II <br />Page 17 of 31 <br />Permit No. CO0048972 <br />which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not <br />mean economic loss caused by delays in production. <br />d. The permittee may allow a bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but <br />only if it also is for essential maintenance or to assure optimal operation. These bypasses are not subject <br />to the provisions of paragraph (a) above. <br />e. The Division may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering adverse effects, if the Division <br />determines that the bypass will meet the conditions specified in paragraph (a) above. <br />S. Upsets <br />a. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with <br />permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset <br />does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment <br />facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper <br />operation. <br />b. Effect of an Upset <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit effluent <br />Limitations if the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are met. No determination made during <br />administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for <br />noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. <br />c. Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset <br />A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly <br />signed contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: <br />i) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />ii) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated and maintained; and <br />iii) The permittee submitted proper notice of the upset as required in the NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS <br />section of this permit (24-hour notice); and <br />iv) The permittee complied with any remedial measure necessary to minimize or prevent any discharge or <br />sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reason able likelihood of adversely <br />affecting human health or the environment. <br />In addition to the demonstration required above, a permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative <br />defense of upset for a violation of effluent limitations based upon water quality standards shall also <br />demonstrate through monitoring, modeling or other methods that the relevant standards were achieved in <br />the receiving water. <br />d. Burden of Proof <br />In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the <br />burden of proof. <br />9. Submission of Incorrect or Incomplete Information <br />Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or <br />submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the Division, the permittee shall <br />promptly submit such facts or information. <br />