My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2015-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:13:20 PM
Creation date
12/18/2015 10:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/15/2015
Doc Name
Coal Transport Scope of Work Mine Eingineer
From
Law Offices of Luke J Danielson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ENGINEERS, INC. <br />3901 S. Industrial Road ! Cheyenne, WY 82007 USA <br />Phone: 307-638-8833 • Facsimile: 307-638-0578 <br />December 15, 2015 <br />Mr. Luke Danielson <br />Law Offices of Luke J. Danielson, P.C. <br />219 N. Iowa Street <br />Gunnison, CO 81230 <br />Re: Report on GCC Energy Coal Transport Options <br />Dear Luke: <br />In response to our discussions and site visit of November 5, 2015, I have prepared the following <br />summary report to address the following work scope items: <br />1. Sharing any observations on the general economics of this project (GCC King II Mine), and <br />the role transportation costs play in those overall economics including estimating remaining <br />resources to be mined and remaining mine life; <br />2. Identifying any options for meeting the transportation needs of this mine that might get <br />traffic off County Road 120; <br />3. Sharing any observations on the relative operating and other costs of the existing "Northern" <br />haul route and the possible "Southern" haul route; <br />4. What observations do you have on the Road Runner report of July 31, 2015? Is there any <br />reason to question the cost estimates for transportation alternatives? <br />5. Are you able to state whether the available information is adequate to allow a reasoned <br />choice among transportation alternatives and if not, what information is needed to make that <br />choice? What analysis do you think needs to be done to make a sound choice of <br />transportation systems? <br />6. How likely is it that there is an option that might be acceptable to all sides? What is the most <br />promising candidate for that role? <br />7. Providing suggestions on how to participate in the approval (EA, etc.) process to reach a <br />solution acceptable to all parties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.