My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2015-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:13:20 PM
Creation date
12/18/2015 10:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/15/2015
Doc Name
Coal Transport Scope of Work Mine Eingineer
From
Law Offices of Luke J Danielson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report on GCC Energy Coal Transport Options <br />rate. Thus, this method is likely more expensive than discontinuous methods described above. <br />Other continuous haulage methods require higher capital investment than a conveyor and are not <br />considered feasible for this application. Any continuous method would require an elevated <br />structure from the King II Mine loadout to cross public roads and the shortest route to a truck <br />loadout adjacent to State Highway 140 for subsequent loading of over -the -road trucks. <br />It is unlikely that use of a conveyor would be lower cost as compared with over -the -road or off- <br />highway trucks on a single use road. Use of off-road trucks on a single use road away from <br />residences along CR120 to a site adjacent to State Highway 140 would be an alternative to <br />current practice of over -the -road trucks using CR120 from the King II Mine loadout to State <br />Highway 140. A cost comparison between these methods could show which has lower impact <br />and may provide a solution to the truck traffic concerns of local citizens. Elements of a <br />comparison of methods may include the following: <br />1. Life of use/mine <br />2. Description of each methods including environmental considerations, ie. noise, light, <br />emissions/dust, etc. <br />3. Preliminary design — plan and profile <br />4. Property ownership and acquisition required <br />5. Roadway construction and maintenance cost <br />6. Haulage equipment cost <br />7. Haulage equipment operating cost <br />8. Reclamation cost <br />9. Net present value calculation <br />10. Impact comparison/assessment <br />11. Summary of findings <br />GCC Energy utilizes two stockpiles at the mine site. The estimated capacity of each is 7,500 <br />tons and accommodates approximately 4 to 6 days of mine production based on the 2014 annual <br />production rate. Low storage volume requires that coal be hauled from the mine site on a daily <br />basis or production would stop. <br />Relative Cost of the Northern vs. Southern Routes <br />Distance measurements to a common point on State Highway 140 from the King II Mine loadout <br />shows that the Northern route using CR120 and State Highway 140 is approximately 3.5 miles <br />longer than the Southern Route. Assuming that the over -road -truck cost is $4.50 per loaded <br />mile, this additional distance equals approximately $0.525/ton higher cost for the Northern route <br />than the Southern route. This comparison does not consider elevation difference in the transport <br />route as it is assumed this would be negligible given speed limits currently in place as well as <br />possible increase of speed limit to 40 miles per hour with proposed upgrades to existing CR120. <br />MINE ENGINEERS, INC. 6 December 15, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.