Laserfiche WebLink
December 4, 2015 C-1981-014/Southfield Mine RDZ <br /> summarizing the lab results,will be sent to EFCI and Dr. Corley. <br /> The culverts that serve as inlets to Pond 5 were inspected, and no erosion,blockage,or other problems were seen <br /> other than the holes in the upper end of the southern culvert(as noted in previous inspections). <br /> The two permanent ponds at the mine site,Pond 4 and Pond 5,were dry and not discharging. No major problems <br /> were found with embankments,flumes,or spillways. <br /> At the RDA,no problems were seen with the ditches or the California crossing. <br /> ROADS—Rule 4.03 <br /> Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3) <br /> Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4) <br /> Surfacing and Maintenance4.03.1(5) and(6)/4.03.2(5)and(6) <br /> Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br /> The inspection entailed another look at the sediment on County Road 92 (CR92)near the main gate into the <br /> Southfield Mine. This area is not within the Southfield Permit Boundary. This area is a major concern of Jack <br /> Robeda and the Corley family and will be the subject of further discussion between EFCI and the Division. <br /> RECLAMATION SUCCESS -Rule 4.15,Rule 3: <br /> Reclamation at the portal/facilities area and on the RDA is generally in good shape. <br /> Near the truck tunnel,the silt fence is in good shape and the wattles have been maintained. The erosion control <br /> practices near the gravel lot are functioning. <br /> SLIDES and DAMAGE - Rule 4.12: <br /> The rill near the northwest corner of the truck tunnel does not appear to be significantly worse. <br /> The repaired slump near Pond 4 appeared stable, and the erosion mats were intact. <br /> SUPPORT FACILITIES -Rule 4.04: <br /> The Monarch Fan was not inspected due to the muddy conditions. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 4 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />