My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981014 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
_INSPECTION - C1981014 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2020 9:17:46 AM
Creation date
12/8/2015 10:32:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
Inspection Date
12/4/2015
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 4, 2015 C-1981-014/Southfield Mine RDZ <br /> summarizing the lab results,will be sent to EFCI and Dr. Corley. <br /> The culverts that serve as inlets to Pond 5 were inspected, and no erosion,blockage,or other problems were seen <br /> other than the holes in the upper end of the southern culvert(as noted in previous inspections). <br /> The two permanent ponds at the mine site,Pond 4 and Pond 5,were dry and not discharging. No major problems <br /> were found with embankments,flumes,or spillways. <br /> At the RDA,no problems were seen with the ditches or the California crossing. <br /> ROADS—Rule 4.03 <br /> Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3) <br /> Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4) <br /> Surfacing and Maintenance4.03.1(5) and(6)/4.03.2(5)and(6) <br /> Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br /> The inspection entailed another look at the sediment on County Road 92 (CR92)near the main gate into the <br /> Southfield Mine. This area is not within the Southfield Permit Boundary. This area is a major concern of Jack <br /> Robeda and the Corley family and will be the subject of further discussion between EFCI and the Division. <br /> RECLAMATION SUCCESS -Rule 4.15,Rule 3: <br /> Reclamation at the portal/facilities area and on the RDA is generally in good shape. <br /> Near the truck tunnel,the silt fence is in good shape and the wattles have been maintained. The erosion control <br /> practices near the gravel lot are functioning. <br /> SLIDES and DAMAGE - Rule 4.12: <br /> The rill near the northwest corner of the truck tunnel does not appear to be significantly worse. <br /> The repaired slump near Pond 4 appeared stable, and the erosion mats were intact. <br /> SUPPORT FACILITIES -Rule 4.04: <br /> The Monarch Fan was not inspected due to the muddy conditions. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 4 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.