My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1973007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1973007
>
2015-12-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1973007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2020 1:40:07 AM
Creation date
12/4/2015 2:49:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973007SG
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/7/2015
Doc Name
IMP CLOSEOUT FILE
From
DRMS
To
DRMS
Email Name
SDT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
497
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECLAMATION PLAN <br /> TIMETABLE <br /> The Little Johnson area should not be allowed to sit unreclaimed for very long. <br /> Reclamation should be done immediately after the completion of mining or as close to the time <br /> of seeding as possible. Delays in reclamation will allow abundant weed growth to become <br /> established and that will make the revegetation program more difficult and less successful. <br /> fn the event the reservoir wilf be constructed either soon after compf etion of mining or-at <br /> . � afterwards, . . . . te permit change may be submitted that wiff address the <br /> needs at that time. hi the event there is a considerabfe defay in the implementation of recfamation <br /> before the reservoir is built, appropriate changes in the pennit or pernfittee will be sought to <br /> accommodate the desires mid needs of the landowner. Examining alf thevarious facets and <br /> possible ffiture events, it is clear that one single, priniary factor controls essentially alf decisions <br /> regarding the use of this land. ff an action has mi adverse inipact on the reniediation progratr thei I <br /> the action either cammot occur or the aetion must be altered so as to not adversely impact the <br /> remeditation program. hi other words, the remeditation progrwn is currently the controffin <br /> In the event the remediation program was concluded in the near future, then that <br /> controlling factor would be replaced by a new controlling factor. That new factor would currently <br /> be the Fountain Mutual Ditch. So long as the ditch is in its current location a decision to remove <br /> the sand under the ditch corridor cannot be made, . THIS WILL <br /> BE FURTHER DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION ADDRESSING THE BLENDING OF THIS <br /> SITE WITH THE REST OF THE PIT. Therefore, at the end of ffie mining of the Little johnson <br /> checkpoint.area, a decision will be made as to the appropriate final action to be taken. At tilat point in tinle it <br /> may be necessary to implement additionaf permit changes or simply proceed with the existing <br /> plan. Thus, the coneltision of the mining is a key <br /> District.C-mitinentall 41vtateriafs (the pertnittee) wilix contact the Division at that point to inforill tile <br /> Division of the status and detennine the appropriate fature action. The determination of the <br /> ffiture action will also involve the landowner, Seettrity Water <br /> TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTION <br /> Please refer to the cross-section at the end of Exhibit D -Mining Plan. This cross-section <br /> shows the approximate configuration of the final topography, assuming the mining proceeds to <br /> the maximum extent in an eastward direction. THIS CROSS SECTION IS NOW TITLED "LJ- <br /> 1" AND IS INCLUDED WITH THE OTHER CROSS SECTIONS THAT ACCOMPANY THE <br /> OVERALL PLAN. <br /> Daniels Sand Pit Amendment (2008) Exhibit E Page 10 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.