My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1974070 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1974070
>
2015-12-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1974070 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2025 1:18:57 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 2:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974070
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/3/2015
Doc Name
IMP CLOSEOUT FILE
From
DRMS
To
DRMS
Email Name
SDT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
eventually by using junior water rights in priority. For these reasons, the Division will not <br /> require bonding to fill reservoirs for operations along the Front Range. However, the Division <br /> will require a statement from the applicant describing their conceptual plan for filling the <br /> reservoir. <br /> Slurry Wall Costs <br /> Slurry wall installation costs include geotechnical investigation and testing, design and quality <br /> control, mobilization and setup, excavation of regolith, excavation of the bedrock key, delivery <br /> of bentonite and water, mixing of slurry, mixing of soil/bentonite, backfilling of soil/bentonite, <br /> clean up and demobilization, and testing and quality assurance. Specialized equipment is <br /> required to excavate deep slurry trenches, and the cost of excavation increases dramatically for <br /> trenches deeper than 35 feet and/or if the bedrock into which the slurry wall will key is hard or <br /> otherwise difficult to excavate. However slurry wall costs may or may not be substantially <br /> increased by depth to bedrock or by excessive difficulty in excavating the key trench, depending <br /> on mine site location. <br /> The following slurry wall cost references are illustrative: <br /> • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers installed slurry walls in an extensive levee improvement <br /> project in the Pocket area near Sacramento, California. These slurry walls were 30 feet deep <br /> with a reported unit installation cost of$5.00 per square foot. <br /> • The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable "Remediation Technologies Screening <br /> Matrix and Reference Guide" reports slurry wall installation costs of between$5.00 and <br /> $7.00 per square foot. <br /> • Environmental Protection Agency document EPA 542-R-98-005, "Evaluation of Subsurface <br /> Engineered Barriers at Waste Sites,"August 1998 reports slurry wall installation costs of <br /> between$5.00 and$15.00 per square foot. <br /> The costs to install slurry walls at waste containment sites are higher than the costs to line <br /> clean water reservoirs using a slurry wall. This is partially due to the need to conduct <br /> chemical compatibility testing and the higher degree of quality control used at waste <br /> containment sites. <br /> In a recent case, the applicant proposed a unit cost of$3.00 per sq. ft for slurry wall installation, <br /> and based on our review of recent bids for slurry walls around gravel pits on the Front Range, <br /> this is believed to be appropriate at this point in time. The slurry wall bond, whether it is for <br /> installation around the entire reservoir perimeter or is a 20 percent contingency bond as <br /> discussed above, should not be released until DMG is provided written confirmation from the <br /> OSE that the specified leakage criteria has beemm€t. <br /> As stated above, it is pertinent to the bond amount that the depth to bedrock used in estimating <br /> the extent of the slurry wall required is accurately determined and that nature of the bedrock is <br /> investigated. The applicant should provide information from bore holes at the site showing the <br /> depth to gravel and the type of bedrock present, any variability in the bedrock encountered, and <br /> the depth of weathering in the bedrock. It is implicit to the proposed slurry wall plan that the <br /> bedrock is a competent seepage barrier, and this is most likely to be the case. However, if <br /> fractured zones, sandy lenses or layers, or deeply weathered bedrock are present, pit floor lining <br /> `^ or a deeper bedrock keyway for the slurry wall may be required. Either solution would increase <br /> J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.