Laserfiche WebLink
2.04.7 Baseline Hydrologic Conditions <br />A review of surface water related sections of Rule 2.04.7 was conducted. The following questions pertain <br />to Exhibit 32: <br />15. Describe to what extent Foidel Creek Mine has been able to improve winter water quality and <br />quantity data collection in affected reaches of the Yampa as related to conclusions 1 a, b, and c <br />drawn in Exhibit 32. <br />16. Describe to what extent a review and update of site-specific regression functions as per <br />conclusion 2 has been undertaken. <br />17. Please state if additional nodes in the streamflow system have been added or modified. If <br />additions or modifications occurred, please state through what permitting action changes were <br />made. (Conclusion 3). <br />18. Please state if a critical review of stream standards, as per conclusion 4 has taken place. <br />19. If a review of stream standards occurred please describe the results of this review and cite, or <br />submit to DRMS, the pertinent document. <br />20. Baseline characterizations of the Wadge Coal/Wolf Creek Coal Interburden and the Wolf Creek <br />Coal Seam were established with the approval of TR -83 as well as the Wolf Creek Reserve <br />monitoring plan in Exhbit 14A. The development of the Wolf Creek Reserve has lowered the <br />poteniometric surface elevation in the Wadge overburden. Figure 06s Potentiometric Surface <br />Wadge Coal Overburden and Figure l Id Wadge Overburden Potentiometric Surface and TDS <br />Foidel Creek Mine -7- 11/23/2015 <br />Protection <br />ID <br />Source <br />NRHP <br />Needed <br />Protection Measures <br />Exhibit 06, <br />No mining under or in the vicinity of <br />5RT192 <br />1984 Report <br />Listed <br />Yes <br />the resource. <br />RN -06 <br />5RT345 <br />I Findings <br />Eligible <br />Not Applicable <br />Approved to be disturbed by PR -02 <br />Avoid - <br />Controlled <br />5RT162 <br />Exhibit 06I <br />Needs Data <br />subsidence <br />Assessed for subsidence impact <br />Corridor was re -aligned to avoid site. <br />5RT30 <br />Exhibit 06H <br />Eligible <br />Yes - Avoid <br />(MR 139). <br />Exhibit 06L; <br />Two track road to 22 -RT well passes <br />Metcalf <br />through site. No additional ground <br />5RT3256 <br />October 2013 <br />Needs data <br />Yes <br />disturbance is allowed. <br />Exhibit 06L; <br />Metcalf August <br />5RT3275 <br />2014 <br />Eligible <br />Yes - Avoid <br />Avoid <br />No vehicle traffic and ground <br />disturbance activities. Drive around <br />5RT1648 <br />Exhibit 06P <br />Needs Data <br />Yes - Avoid <br />current graded road to the south. <br />Avoided by additional activities that <br />Yes - Avoid <br />impact undisturbed areas. Existing <br />additional surface <br />maintenance can continue without <br />5RT993 <br />Exhibit 06P <br />Needs Data <br />impact <br />impacting site. <br />This site was re-evaluated. A portion of <br />the site which could have research <br />potential should not be impacted by <br />5RT487 <br />Exhibit 6T <br />Needs Data <br />Yes - Avoid <br />conveyor construction. <br />2.04.7 Baseline Hydrologic Conditions <br />A review of surface water related sections of Rule 2.04.7 was conducted. The following questions pertain <br />to Exhibit 32: <br />15. Describe to what extent Foidel Creek Mine has been able to improve winter water quality and <br />quantity data collection in affected reaches of the Yampa as related to conclusions 1 a, b, and c <br />drawn in Exhibit 32. <br />16. Describe to what extent a review and update of site-specific regression functions as per <br />conclusion 2 has been undertaken. <br />17. Please state if additional nodes in the streamflow system have been added or modified. If <br />additions or modifications occurred, please state through what permitting action changes were <br />made. (Conclusion 3). <br />18. Please state if a critical review of stream standards, as per conclusion 4 has taken place. <br />19. If a review of stream standards occurred please describe the results of this review and cite, or <br />submit to DRMS, the pertinent document. <br />20. Baseline characterizations of the Wadge Coal/Wolf Creek Coal Interburden and the Wolf Creek <br />Coal Seam were established with the approval of TR -83 as well as the Wolf Creek Reserve <br />monitoring plan in Exhbit 14A. The development of the Wolf Creek Reserve has lowered the <br />poteniometric surface elevation in the Wadge overburden. Figure 06s Potentiometric Surface <br />Wadge Coal Overburden and Figure l Id Wadge Overburden Potentiometric Surface and TDS <br />Foidel Creek Mine -7- 11/23/2015 <br />