My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-09-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-09-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:11:00 PM
Creation date
11/4/2015 12:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/28/2015
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.7 HYDROLOGY INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• discharge from Sedimentation Pond L-1 and this pond has never discharged <br />since its initial construction in 1981. EFCI has therefore concluded and <br />the CMLRD has concurred, that flow monitoring in Chandler Creek would be <br />of little value and is not necessary. <br />Surface Water Use <br />Surface water use within the drainage basin is generally limited to large <br />volume municipal use or small to moderate volume irrigation use. <br />Diversions for beneficial surface water use exist on Newlin, Hardscrabble, <br />Oak, and Chandler Creek and the Arkansas River. The only existing <br />diversion in the mine, loadout, or adjacent areas is the diversion for the <br />City of Florence on Newlin Creek previously described in this section. <br />Other surface water rights within the drainage basin are summarized by <br />Table 15, Surface Water Rights - Mine and Loadout Area. This listing <br />• includes both upstream and downstream water rights on potentially effected <br />drainages. It should be noted that the mine disturbance area is <br />effectively hydrologically isolated from downstream drainages due to <br />prevailing dry streambead conditions and ephemeral flow conditions in <br />lower Newlin Creek. As a result, downstream water users do not issue <br />calls on upstream junior water rights since transfer of water is not <br />feasible. <br />Surface Water Oualitv <br />As previously noted, there are significant differences in surface water <br />quality for upland and lowland portions of area drainages as well as for <br />perennial and ephemeral streams. Generally, upland drainages originating <br />in the heavily forested mountainous areas to the west have demonstrated <br />relatively low TSS levels due to limited erosion in forested areas, well <br />armored rocky stream channels, and elevated flow volumes consistent with <br />large contributing drainage areas and perennial flow characteristics. <br />• Transitional and lowland drainages, on the other hand, commonly have <br />relatively high levels of TSS and variable levels of TDS. Elevated TSS <br />results from increased erosion of more sparsely vegetated lowland areas <br />2.04.7-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.