Laserfiche WebLink
Bowie Resources, LLC <br />Page 5 <br />10/28/2015 <br />consequences" (PHC) <br />current, CDRMS <br />1996-083. Conductivity was above average at the majority <br />projected in mining <br />regulation 2.03.3(1) <br />of the sites when compared to baseline data. <br />The water quality reported for a majority of surface water <br />sites fell within the baseline ranges. Higher than average <br />parameters were identified both at sites affected by mining <br />and those not affected by mining. See Table 3 below. <br />Ground water— No material damage has occurred, as <br />discussed in item 21, above. However, ground water wells <br />DH -15, DH -25, DH -38, and DH -67B were identified as being <br />destroyed, blocked, or otherwise inaccessible. As such, no <br />data has been collected from these sites. A determination <br />of compliance cannot be made due to a failure to collect and <br />submit the required data. <br />The PHC predicts that leachate from the coal stockpiles and <br />refuse areas could impact water quality on the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River, and notes that water quality <br />degradation is to be expected in the alluvial wells installed <br />along the river, but that the impact on the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison should be minimal. Based on the information in <br />the 2014 AHR, data for the alluvial wells does indicate a <br />general degradation in water quality based on comparisons <br />with baseline averages. See Table 2 below <br />15. Adequacy of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />The current ground water monitoring program continues to <br />ground water <br />4.05.13(1) <br />adequately address the protection of the hydrologic balance. <br />monitoring program <br />16. Adequacy of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />The current surface water monitoring program continues to <br />surface water <br />4.05.13(2) <br />adequately address the protection of the hydrologic balance. <br />monitoring program <br />