Laserfiche WebLink
about the property line with adjacent Carey property. It was estimated that approximately 2 cfs were <br />flowing to the Carey Pond and as much as 1 cfs was flowing in the new ditch. The water at the end <br />of the new ditch that runs to the north and turns abruptly to the west seemed to disappear into the <br />ground (see Photo No 40). The location where the water was seeping into the ground is above in <br />elevation and to the southwest of the South Portal backfill. The dip of the coal and surrounding strata <br />in this locale is to the northeast, so the water application is immediately up gradient of the South <br />Portal. <br />The inspection then continued down to the South Portal where we noted a higher than usual flow in <br />the french drain that drains from the portal backfill. The flow was significantly high such that there <br />was flowing water in the ditch that conveys the french drain down to the road crossing and then below <br />to the toe of the Roadside South Refuse Disposal Area (RSRDA). This is the most water that The <br />Division has noticed in the french drain ditch seeping from the portal backfill material since it was <br />installed. We looked for evidence of seepage in the outcrop and surrounding strata above and to the <br />sides of the portal area but did not note any evidence of water. We proceeded around the toe of the <br />refuse pile to Outfall 005 site of reclaimed Pond 009 and saw that there was significant flow in the <br />ditch such that it was making it to the culvert that goes under I-70 and off of the permit boundary. I <br />returned to the site on June 12'' to photograph the site. All of the photos referenced herein were taken <br />on June 12, 17, and 24, 2014. <br />On June 17, 2014, I was notified by Tonya Hammond of SCC that the flow had increased significantly <br />over the weekend and that she felt the Division should come out and meet with her and Jim Stover at <br />the site to inspect the seepage from the South Portal. When I arrived at the site on the 170' the flow <br />was substantially greater than I observed on the 11 �h and appeared to be flowing at about 60 gpm in <br />the french drain ditch. We also noted seepage from the base of the concrete abutment north of the <br />backfill and from the south side of the backfill material itself. On the south side of the backfill, the <br />slope was saturated up to a height of 7 feet. The south portal backfill is shown in Photograph No 41. <br />The Division called Mr. Fontanari that afternoon and asked him to shut the water off that is flowing <br />in the ditches to avoid any further saturation of the portal backfill. He confirmed that he would shut <br />the water off the following morning on June 18th. The next day, I returned to the site and visually <br />confirmed that the water had been turned off. Because of the concern that the portal backfill had the <br />potential to fail due to water backing up behind the seals, SCC contracted Huddleston -Berry <br />Engineering & Testing, LLC (HBET) to evaluate the South Portal seepage and prepare a geotechnical <br />report addressing the risk of failure. In HBET's report dated June 19, 2014, HBET concluded that <br />they did not believe that there was an imminent risk of catastrophic failure of the earthen portal <br />backfill. <br />However, due to the potential for failure and other related health and safety concerns, the Division <br />requested that SCC begin daily inspection of the seepage from the South Portal and the Division <br />conducted weekly inspections. SCC installed a flume to get an accurate measurement of flow in the <br />french drain ditch that conveys the seepage down around the RSRDA to Outfall 005. During an <br />inspection on June 22, 2014, Tonya Hammond discovered that Mr. Fontanari had reactivated his <br />water application and was flood irrigating his property above the mine. Due to the seriousness of the <br />situation, the Division notified the Colorado Department of Transportation, Mesa County Sheriff, <br />State Office of Emergency Management, and the Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR) of <br />Page 32 <br />