Laserfiche WebLink
Chris Gilbreath <br />Page 4 <br />than the selected worst case with the maximum configuration of the temporary spoil pile, it should <br />be described in the introductory text in the exhibit. <br /> <br />In Rule 4 for Collom, on page 7, further clarification of the text is needed. <br />ITEM 46. In Section <br />4.05.13 there is a sentence that reads, “All surface water and shallow groundwater monitoring data is <br />submitted in an annual report.” This is not true (or is at least confusing) because Colowyo data for the <br />NPDES permit is not reported in AHRs. The Division recommends that the sentence be placed in <br />another paragraph (separated from the NPDES discussion) and be changed to the following: “In addition <br />to the NPDES data, monitoring data is collected for receiving waters (creeks listed below) and shallow <br />groundwater; this data is submitted each year in an annual report (the Annual Hydrology and Reclamation <br /> <br />Report).” <br /> <br />ITEM 47. Response is adequate. <br /> <br />ITEM 48. The word “and” was not included after “Creek”, and the first comma in the sentence is not <br /> Please further revise the sentence. <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />ITEM 49. The sampling sites for the East Fork of Jubb Creek are still unclear. The map says that they <br /> Please revise the map or the table, as <br />are currently monitored, but they are not listed in the table. <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />ITEM 50. Response is adequate. <br /> <br />ITEM 51. Response is adequate. <br /> <br />ITEM 52. Response is adequate. <br /> <br />ITEM 53. Response is adequate. <br /> <br />ITEM 54. Response is adequate. <br /> <br /> <br />Additional Items - General <br /> <br /> <br />Colowyo will need to account for page changes <br />ITEM 55. In the text, exhibits, and maps of the PAP, <br />from other revisions <br /> (e.g., TR-105) that were submitted after PR-04 was submitted but were (or will likely <br />be) approved before PR-04 is approved. <br /> <br />ITEM 56. On Map 11, the Rail Loop Pond is mislabeled as the Loop Pond, and the Stoker Siding Pond is <br />Please revise the map to address these omissions. <br />lacking a reference to the design exhibit. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />