My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:11:31 PM
Creation date
10/15/2015 7:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/13/2015
Doc Name
Appendix H 2014 Vegetation Data
From
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"Guidelines Regarding Selected Coal Mine Bond Release Issues" issued April 18, 1995. The <br />corresponding vegetation maps showing the location of the four reference areas sampled in <br />connection with this sampling effort were taken from the current Southfield Mine Permit, <br />Annual Reclamation Report Maps and the recent information submitted in connection with <br />Technical Revisions Numbers 39 and 45. The boundaries of the specific reclamation units <br />sampled were taken from the 2012 Annual Reclamation Report Maps for both the Southfield <br />Mine and the Southfield Loadout areas. <br />Prior to commencing the field sampling, the permit monitoring requirements were carefully <br />reviewed and discussed with Mr. Patterson (EFCI) and Ms. Janet Binns of the Colorado <br />Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety (CDRMS) regarding the proposed sampling and <br />data analysis methods to be used in this evaluation. Verbal approval for these sampling <br />methodologies was given in various conference calls, as well as written approval in the form of <br />e-mails. In this evaluation, the vegetation parameters of plant cover, forage production, species <br />diversity, and woody plant density were sampled. These data were then utilized to evaluate the <br />successfulness of revegetation efforts with respect to these parameters as required by the <br />Southfield Mine Permit. <br />Transect Locations. To ensure all areas within the various reclamation and reference areas <br />being sampled, had an equal chance of being selected, each proposed sample area was treated <br />as a single sample unit and a randomized sampling effort was implemented. Utilizing the mine <br />maps; showing the specific reclamation and reference area locations, the 2012 Annual <br />Reclamation Report maps prepared by EFCI and GPS units, the extreme north, south, east and <br />west boundaries of each site sampled were converted to the 1983 Colorado State Plane Central <br />Zone (NAD 83) coordinate system or the original Southfield Mine coordinate system. The <br />interval used in the state plan coordinate system is based on foot increments. Given the typical <br />real-time accuracy of the Trimble Model Geo XH GPS unit of plus or minus 50 cm (1.67 feet) <br />used by IME, their transect locations were field located at a sub -meter accuracy. Mergen <br />Ecological Delineations, Inc., used a Garmin GPS Map 76S model GPS unit which has an <br />accuracy of approximately 10 meters. <br />Once the boundaries of the reclaimed and reference areas were delineated, transect coordinates <br />located within the study area boundaries were randomly determined using computer software <br />which generated random coordinates in the study area. These coordinates were then entered <br />into the GPS unit and the transect location starting points were located in the field using the <br />navigate feature of the GPS unit. At each transect location starting point, the transect alignment <br />was determined by selecting a previously determined random direction based on the degrees of <br />the compass (1 to 360 degrees). Once the transect bearing was determined, a 50 -meter long <br />tape was then laid out across the site. All transects were kept within the designated sample unit <br />boundaries. If the transect placement resulted in the transect alignment crossing a sample unit <br />boundary, the transect line was backed up 180 degrees until it was all within the sample unit <br />boundary. Where the transect tape could not be placed within a narrow reclaimed area due to <br />boundary constraints, then the transect line was bent approximately 90 degrees at the point <br />where the boundary line was crossed to ensure that the entire transect alignment was located <br />within the designated area to be sampled. This can be seen on the enclosed maps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.