My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 2:09:39 PM
Creation date
10/15/2015 7:43:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/13/2015
Doc Name
Appenidx G 2013 Vegetation Data
From
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with respect to "allowable plant cover" on the areas corresponding to the Loadout Reclamation <br />would be 19.38% (21.53% x.90 = 19.38%). Application of the sample adequacy calculation to <br />these data means that the number of samples needed to characterize the parameter of "allowable <br />plant cover" for the Loadout Reference Area at the 90% confidence interval is 18.1 samples. <br />On the Loadout Reference Area, the average forage production was 8.37 g/1/4m2 or 298.3 pounds <br />per acre with a standard deviation of 4.76. The ultimate revegetation success standard with <br />respect to forage production would be 7.53g/l/4m2 or 268.5 pounds per acre (8.37 g/1/4m2 X.90 = <br />268.5#/A). Application of the sample adequacy equation to these data would mean that the <br />number of samples needed to characterize the forage production for the Loadout Reference Area <br />at the 90% confidence interval was 93.4 samples. Since only 30 production samples were <br />collected, an insufficient number of samples were collected to characterize the forage production <br />at the 90% confidence interval as are required by the CDRMS regulations, this means that the <br />ultimate comparison of forage production will have to be made using the "reverse null" statistical <br />method. <br />Loadout Reclamation Area. For the Loadout Reclamation Area, the average "allowable plant <br />cover" equaled 25.65% with a standard deviation of 6.91. Application of the sample adequacy <br />calculation to these data would mean that the number of samples needed to characterize the <br />parameter of "allowable plant cover" for the Loadout Reclamation Area at the 90% confidence <br />interval is 21.4 samples. Since 23 samples were collected on Loadout Reclaimed Area, it can be <br />concluded that a sufficient number of samples were collected to characterize the parameter of <br />"allowable plant cover" at the 90% confidence interval as are required by the CDRMS regulations <br />and the ultimate comparison for "allowable plant cover" can be made by direct comparison. <br />Since sample adequacy for "allowable plant cover" was achieved for the Loadout Reference Area <br />(N=21 and Nm=11.2) and also for the Loadout Reclaimed Area (N=23 and Nm=12.7) the ultimate <br />successfulness of the revegetation efforts with respect to "allowable plant cover" can be made by <br />direct comparison. <br />Since the average "allowable plant cover" value from the Loadout Reclaimed Area (25.65%) <br />exceeds that of the Loadout Reference Area (21.38%), it can be concluded that the first year's <br />Phase III revegetation monitoring demonstrates that the Loadout Reclaimed Area can be deemed <br />to be successful respect to the parameter of allowable plant cover. <br />On the Loadout Reference Area, the average forage production equaled 8.37 g/1/4m2 or 298.3 <br />pounds per acre with a standard deviation of 4.76. Application of the sample adequacy equation <br />to these data (N=30 and Nm=55.6) means that the ultimate comparison of forage production must <br />be made using the "reverse null" statistical method. On the Loadout Reclamation Area, the <br />average forage production equaled 12.81 g/1/4m2 or 456.5 pounds per acre with a standard <br />deviation of 5.07. Application of the sample adequacy equation to these data (N=30 and <br />Nm=26.9). <br />With respect to the successfulness of revegetation efforts on the Loadout Reclamation 2013 Study <br />Area, since sample adequacy was not achieved for the forage production sampling of the Loadout <br />Reference Area (N=30 and Nm=55.6) but was achieved for the Loadout Reclaimed Area (N=30 <br />and Nm=26.9), the reverse null statistical approach must be used. Application of the "reverse <br />null" statistical approach documents that the forage production for the Loadout Reclaimed Area, <br />the tc value equals 5.7038. Since the calculated the t,, value (5.7038) from the Loadout <br />Reclaimed Area, exceeds the t, value (0.854), it can be concluded that Loadout Reclaimed Area, <br />satisfies the revegetation success standards for forage production. <br />The Southfield Mine Permit contains two species diversity standards for the Southfield Loadout <br />Area. The four most dominant species cannot "comprise no more than 80% of the total species <br />composition" The four dominant plant species on the Loadout Reclamation Area, collectively <br />contribute 79.60% of the total plant cover. Since this value is less than 80%, the four dominants <br />species diversity test has been satisfied for the Loadout Reclamation Area. Since there is a <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.