Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br />Section 3.03.1 <br />is represented by averaging the sum of the values for plant cover and litter cover in 2013 and 2014 <br />taken from the RDA reference area, the Portal reference area, and the Old Portal reference area. The <br />post mine, or reclaimed condition, was determined using the same method but by using the data as <br />collected from the RDA reclamation, the Corley reclamation, and the Vento reclamation in 2013 and <br />2014. The cover values were again averaged for the three reclaimed areas. The C factor for the <br />different vegetation types and cover were determined from Table 813.2, C factors for Permanent <br />Pasture, Rangeland, Idle land, and Grazed Woodlands, found in Design Hydrology and Sedimentology for <br />Small Catchments, Barfield Warner and Hayes, 1994. The values utilized are shown on Table 1. <br />Mean Cover Reference Areas (non -mined condition) <br />2013 <br />2014 <br />Mean Plant and <br />litter cover <br />RDA reference area 70.27 <br />75.33 <br />72.8 <br />Portal reference area 73.82 <br />67.73 <br />70.78 <br />Old Portal Refer. area 63.52 <br />83.9 <br />73.71 <br />Two year mean <br />72.43 <br />Mean Cover Reclaimed Areas (reclaimed condition) <br />2013 <br />2014 <br />Mean Plant and litter <br />cover <br />Corley reclamation 65.47 <br />77.34 <br />71.40 <br />Vento reclamation 75.8 <br />65.47 <br />70.63 <br />RDA reclamation 80.08 <br />82.2 <br />81.14 <br />Two year mean <br />74.39 <br />Table 1 <br />C Factors <br />Area % Canopy and <br />Type % <br />C <br />Height <br />Ground <br />Factor <br />Cover <br />Facility and RDA (reference area) 25% <br />G 72.43% <br />.0218 <br />Facility and RDA (reclaimed area) 25% <br />G 74.39% <br />.0193 <br />Support Practice Factor (P) <br />The P factor represents the ratio of soil loss from any conservation practice to that with upslope and <br />downslope tillage. It is used to evaluate the effects of contour tillage, strip -cropping, terracing, subsurface <br />drainage, and dryland farm surface roughening. While a cover crop and seeding practices on the reclaimed <br />area may have roughened the soil initially in the revegetation liability period, there is no support for any <br />remaining effects of these conservation practices as compared to the non -mined reference area. For <br />reclaimed and non -mined conditions a P factor of 1.0 was used. <br />RESULTS <br />The above input parameters were substituted into the RUSLE equation for both the reclaimed and non - <br />mined condition. As shown below in Table 2, sediment yield for the reclaimed condition is slightly less <br />than the non -mined condition for the Southfield Mine site and RDA. <br />