My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-10-09_PERMIT FILE - M2007087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2007087
>
2015-10-09_PERMIT FILE - M2007087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:11:27 PM
Creation date
10/13/2015 5:04:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007087
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/9/2015
Doc Name
Reclamation Start Extrension Request
From
Albert Frei & Sons
To
DRMS
Email Name
TOD
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35. Defendants' breach of the Contract and Amendments thereto has <br />caused Plaintiff damages in an amount to be established at trial. <br />WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as set forth below. <br />Second Claim for Relief <br />(Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) <br />36. By this reference, Plaintiff repeats and incorporates the averments <br />contained in Paragraphs 1 through 35 of the Complaint as fully as if set forth herein <br />verbatim. <br />37. Colorado law implies a covenant of good faith and fair dealing in all <br />contracts, including the Contract. <br />38. The implied common purpose of the contract was for the Property to <br />be reclaimed to allow industrial development. <br />39. Plaintiff had a reasonable expectation that Defendant would reclaim <br />the Property to allow industrial development. <br />40. Defendant breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing by inter alia, <br />failing to reclaim the Property to the specifications of the Final Drainage Plan, which <br />would allow for maximum area of industrial development. <br />41. Defendants' actions in violation of the implied covenant of good faith <br />and fair dealing have caused Plaintiff damages in an amount to be established at trial. <br />Third Claim For Relief <br />(Promissory Estoppel) <br />42. By this reference, Plaintiff repeats and incorporates each and every <br />averment contained in Paragraphs 1 through 41 of this Complaint as if set forth <br />herein verbatim. <br />43. Defendant promised Plaintiff that it would reclaim the Property in <br />compliance with the Final Drainage Plan and to the Fill Elevation indicated on the <br />Memorial Pole by December 2014 if Plaintiff created a final drainage plan by <br />September of 2014. <br />44. Defendants should have reasonably expected that these promises <br />would induce Plaintiff to incur costs to create a final drainage plan. <br />R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.