Laserfiche WebLink
because very little of their area will be impacted by mining. These basins include Small Gulch, Ute Gulch, <br />South Gulches #1 and #2, Castor Gulch and Horse Gulch. <br />Water use on the mine plan area has been limited to stock watering from ponds. Location of stock ponds <br />is shown on Map M-31. <br />Trapper submitted PR -07 in May of 2013 with the intent to extend the perimeter boundary of the mine to <br />the Knez Divide road, otherwise known as Moffat County Road 33. This small permit extension adjoins <br />the active mine area and permit boundary as of 2013. Within these expansion area portions of two <br />previously undisturbed drainages will be included in the permit boundary. <br />Deacon Gulch originates in the expansion area with an upland headwaters area and flows northward to <br />the Yampa River. The drainage within the expansion area does not contain any defined channels and <br />consists of a large bowl fed my several small upland swales within the native mountain brush community. <br />Initial baseline monitoring of the area has indicated water flows in this drainage may only occur during <br />intense precipitation or heavy snowmelt events. No perennial or intermittent flows have been recorded in <br />the drainage within the expansion area. Further downstream Deacon Gulch becomes steeper and gains <br />significantly more area. The drainage channel becomes more entrenched exposing areas of ground <br />water influence on the surface drainage. Larger flows are still limited to springtime melts and precipitation <br />events. The flow regime within the expansion area should be characteristic of other upland headwaters in <br />the eastern portion of the current mine permit area. <br />Jeffway Gulch originates opposite of Deacon Gulch in the expansion area and flows southward to the <br />Williams Fork River. Jeffway is characteristic of the drainages on the south slopes of the Williams Fork <br />Mountains. The lower reaches of this drainage are deep canyons with milder gradients than the north <br />flanking drainages. Within the expansion area Jeffway Gulch primarily consists of upland headwaters <br />areas within sagebrush and grass covered meadows and mountain brush community upland swales. At <br />the southern edge of the expansion area a large un -named tributary to Jeffway Gulch joins the main <br />channel. In this area a series of seeps are present within the expansion area, as is intermittent flows from <br />a large seep complex within the tributary from the east. The area becomes very wet at this junction and a <br />defined channel leaves the expansion area at County Road 33. This riparian area is not expected to be <br />disturbed as it is beyond the extent of the coal reserves in this area. The seeps appear to originate from <br />the base of the Twenty Mile Sandstone and shale layers below the sandstone. This is characteristic of <br />this interface as is evident with seeps located within Deal and Horse Gulch. The upland portions of the <br />drainage above the seep complex appear to only flow during intense precipitation or heavy snowmelt <br />events. No perennial or intermittent flows have been recorded in the drainage above the seep complex. <br />The anticipated watershed yield is contained in Table 2.7-12 for Deacon and Jeffway Gulches. The <br />majority of these drainages within the expansion area would be ephemeral. Minimal flows are anticipated <br />from the area. Maximum flows of these drainages would be dictated by the corresponding precipitation <br />event and the area involved. Due to the placement of the drainages within their overall watershed, large <br />flow events are not anticipated. There is no historic evidence of large flows occurring within these <br />drainages within the expansion area. Continued monitoring of these drainages will occur and any further <br />flow data will be analyzed and added. <br />JUI 0 8 2014 Revision: Ipj — D-7 <br />2-4141 /approved: <br />