My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-31_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2015-08-31_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2018 7:21:27 AM
Creation date
10/9/2015 8:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/31/2015
Doc Name
pages 2-346 to 2-424 (2-392 to 2-401 confidential)
Section_Exhibit Name
2.7 Hydrology
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The water yield for East Pyeatt gulch was determined at the flume site S-3 (East Pyeatt drainage). As <br />mentioned previously, East Pyeatt runoff is monitored continuously with a Stevens type F recorder. <br />Figure 2.7-15a is a plot of the runoff for the period of April 1, 1985 to October 31, 1986. The volume of <br />runoff from August, 1985 to July 31, 1988 was approximately 260 acre -ft. The drainage area above the <br />East Pyeatt flume site (S-3) is 1,346 acres. Baseflow is estimated to be approximately 125 gallons per <br />minute (Figure 2.7-15a). The baseflow, therefore, accounts for approximately 200 acre -ft of flow per <br />year. Runoff from precipitation would, therefore, total 60 acre ft/yr or a depth of 0.5 inches for the period <br />analyzed. This value is lower than the estimated mean annual runoff yield from the basin due to the <br />wanner temperatures in earty 1986. <br />During the months of January, February, March and April, the average daily high temperature was above <br />freezing at 33.1, 38.0, 52.9 and 54.3 degrees F, respectively. The significance of these mean daily highs <br />is that the snowpack melted during a longer span of time, thereby allowing for more infiltration and less <br />runoff. It is evident from Figure 2.7-15a that a much higher rate of runoff occurred during the spring of <br />1985 when temperatures were more normal than during the spring of 1986. <br />Some over -estimation of the flow in the analysis occurs for the winter months. Due to the remoteness of <br />• the sites, the stilling wells were often frozen. During these months, occasional warts temperatures would <br />allow the stilling well to thaw. The measurements obtained on the wanner days were averaged and <br />assumed to be representative of the monthly flow rate. The runoff value obtained by this method is <br />higher than the actual average flow. <br />2-41aa <br />MAY -L-3�9$----- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.